Patient satisfaction and quality of life similar across all appendicitis treatments

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A new study published in the journal JAMA Surgery in February 2020 shows that patients with acute appendicitis that were successfully treated either by antibiotics or by appendectomy had identical satisfaction with their treatment and identical quality of life over the long term. The patients who were first treated conservatively and then had appendectomy had lower satisfaction rates.

Appendicitis is the inflammation of a small finger-like organ attached to the beginning of the large bowel. This condition, if left untreated, sometimes progresses to form a pelvic abscess. This finding has led to the widespread belief that if acute appendicitis is demonstrated, an emergency appendectomy is the answer. This, however, overlooks the basic fact that antibiotics came to be widely used only 40 years later.

Appendicitis scar. Image Credit: Avigator Fortuner / Shutterstock
Appendicitis scar. Image Credit: Avigator Fortuner / Shutterstock

The study

The researchers looked at 423 patients in Finland who had been part of the Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) study. The current study was a follow-up of this group at 7 years. The patients filled out questionnaires about their quality of life and satisfaction with their treatment.

The APPAC study

APPAC was a randomized clinical trial for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis. The trial randomly assigned half the patients to appendectomy and the other half to antibiotics.

About 60% of the patients on antibiotics recovered fully. This helped many physicians to switch to an initial non-operative approach for this condition. However, many others found much to dislike, from the fact that 40% of patients ultimately had to undergo surgery, that powerful antibiotics needed to be administered, and that the patient had to stay in hospital for three days, as well as the open surgery rather than laparoscopic surgical method used.

At the time of the APPAC study, a non-surgical approach to acute appendicitis was unheard of. To get enough cases in the study, the investigators were forced to compromise with the surgeons involved, that if in their judgment it was required, operative treatment could be given even to the patients in the non-surgical arm. The scenarios envisaged included signs of progressive infection, perforation of the appendix, or peritonitis.

Moreover, the antibiotics were probably stronger than strictly necessary because the trial was, in part, an attempt to prove the reliability of medical treatment in acute uncomplicated appendicitis. In short, the trial results provide a lower than the actual estimate of the favorable outcome of these patients when treated with antibiotics.

The findings

The results showed that patients who had successful treatment had similar rates of satisfaction with their treatment and similar quality of life. However, those patients who were first treated with antibiotics but later had an appendectomy were less satisfied with their treatment.

The study is limited by the fact that open surgery was used in the first part of the trial for appendectomy, because today laparoscopic appendectomy is the standard of care for this condition, due to the briefer stay in hospital and the reduction in postoperative pain.

The implications

In an accompanying editorial, Edward Livingstone points out that patients in either arm had no measurable difference in the quality of life or satisfaction with treatment. Even though those who failed to show adequate response to the antibiotic were eventually taken up for surgery, this does not change the fact that in the group who were successfully treated non-surgically, there is no evidence of lingering infection. The most feared complication of infection is its spread, which could cause disability or death unless appropriately managed.

The editorial concludes, “Future studies should refine the approach used by the APPAC investigators to better understand how to nonoperatively manage acute appendicitis.”

Journal reference:

Sippola S, Haijanen J, Viinikainen L, et al. Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction at 7-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. Published online February 19, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6028

Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2020, February 19). Patient satisfaction and quality of life similar across all appendicitis treatments. News-Medical. Retrieved on May 28, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "Patient satisfaction and quality of life similar across all appendicitis treatments". News-Medical. 28 May 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "Patient satisfaction and quality of life similar across all appendicitis treatments". News-Medical. (accessed May 28, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2020. Patient satisfaction and quality of life similar across all appendicitis treatments. News-Medical, viewed 28 May 2024,


The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Vitrification technique leads to successful birth after ovarian tissue cryopreservation