How feasible and accurate are self-collected samples for the diagnosis of monkeypox?

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* server, a team of researchers evaluated the performance of monkeypox virus (MPXV)-infected patients' self-collected versus physician-collected clinical samples, including skin lesions, pharyngeal, and rectal swabs in the diagnostic tests.

Study: Evaluating the accuracy of self-collected swabs for the diagnosis of monkeypox. Image Credit: Corona Borealis Studio/Shutterstock
Study: Evaluating the accuracy of self-collected swabs for the diagnosis of monkeypox. Image Credit: Corona Borealis Studio/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Background

Self-sampling has shown to be a reliable strategy for diagnosing sexually transmitted diseases (STDs), such as chlamydia and gonorrhea, based on nucleic acid amplification testing and recently coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, this approach has not yet been tested and validated for Monkeypox diagnosis.

About the study

In the present study, researchers performed a diagnostic accuracy evaluation of self-sampling in the MPXV settings. They recruited individuals from three centers in Spain who presented with lesions indicating an MPXV infection within ten days before the study screening. A dermatologist or an STD specialist clinically assessed these patients and enrolled those in the study who were suspected of having MPXV infection.

All the study participants received a home testing kit with instructions, including dacron-tipped swabs for sample collection, pre-labeled swab containers, and a mailing envelope. The team trained these individuals for self-collection of samples and asked them to self-collect swabs from the skin lesions, the oropharynx, and the rectum on day 1 of the study.

The participants stored the self-collected samples at 4ºC after collection and contacted the courier service, which transferred these samples to a microbiology laboratory in Spain for diagnostic testing.

The researchers analyzed swabs using a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), and all patients having positive samples collected by a physician on day 0 were included in the study analyses. All these participants had confirmed MPXV infection.

Study findings         

In total, the study enrolled 50 patients with suspected MPXV infection. All the patients were male, with an average age of 33.5 years. They had qPCR-confirmed MPXV infection in at least one of the self-collected diagnostic specimens. At baseline, the number of skin lesions and pharyngeal and rectal swabs was 49, 38, and 11, respectively. All self-collected skin lesion swabs were positive for MPXV DNA. However, only 68% and 82% of oropharyngeal and rectal swabs were positive for MPXV DNA.

The researchers noted the highest overall agreement of 98% in skin lesional swabs. Surprisingly, only one individual tested negative in the physician-collected skin lesion swab and positive in the self-collected skin lesion swab sample. Likewise, the overall agreement for throat and rectal specimens was 79% and 90%, with kappa values of 0.49 and 0.6, respectively.

Furthermore, the researchers noted no significant differences in cycle threshold (CT) values between physician- and self-collected skin lesion and throat specimens. Conversely, self-collected rectal swabs had higher CT values than physician-collected samples, with an absolute difference of 5.5; and a 95% confidence interval (CI). The mean CT values of physician- and self-collected swabs were 22.5 and 23.2, respectively, with an absolute difference of 0.7; and a 95% CI.

Conclusions

According to the authors, this is the first study to demonstrate the feasibility of the self-sampling approach for the diagnosis of MPXV. Overall, self-collected swabs had high precision and comparable viral loads to physician-collected swabs. Patient-collected skin swabs are not typically used to diagnose common blistering skin diseases, such as herpes or varicella. However, these patient-collected swab samples from skin lesions had comparable high-performance characteristics to physician-collected swab samples.

The overall agreement between physician- and self-collected oropharyngeal swabs was lower than for other samples, most likely due to variation in the sample quality. However, fluctuations in viral load within the pharynx are also possible.

To summarize, the self-sampling approach explored in the current study offered many significant advantages for patients and disease control. It facilitated the integration of monkeypox into routine testing with other STDs in high-risk populations. Future studies should optimize sample collection and include more samples, such as saliva, to accentuate the ease of diagnostic testing.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 15 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Neha Mathur

Written by

Neha Mathur

Neha is a digital marketing professional based in Gurugram, India. She has a Master’s degree from the University of Rajasthan with a specialization in Biotechnology in 2008. She has experience in pre-clinical research as part of her research project in The Department of Toxicology at the prestigious Central Drug Research Institute (CDRI), Lucknow, India. She also holds a certification in C++ programming.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mathur, Neha. (2023, May 15). How feasible and accurate are self-collected samples for the diagnosis of monkeypox?. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 13, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220922/How-feasible-and-accurate-are-self-collected-samples-for-the-diagnosis-of-monkeypox.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mathur, Neha. "How feasible and accurate are self-collected samples for the diagnosis of monkeypox?". News-Medical. 13 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220922/How-feasible-and-accurate-are-self-collected-samples-for-the-diagnosis-of-monkeypox.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mathur, Neha. "How feasible and accurate are self-collected samples for the diagnosis of monkeypox?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220922/How-feasible-and-accurate-are-self-collected-samples-for-the-diagnosis-of-monkeypox.aspx. (accessed April 13, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Mathur, Neha. 2023. How feasible and accurate are self-collected samples for the diagnosis of monkeypox?. News-Medical, viewed 13 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220922/How-feasible-and-accurate-are-self-collected-samples-for-the-diagnosis-of-monkeypox.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Global study reveals varied intention to receive monkeypox vaccine: 61% prevalence worldwide