No improvement in freedom from progression rates for patients: Study

Results from the NRG Oncology NRG-RTOG 0232 clinical trial adding external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to brachytherapy (BT) in men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer indicate that there was no improvement in freedom from progression (FFP) rates for patients.

Late adverse events were significantly increased (> 6 months from treatment start) in genitourinary (GU)/gastrointestinal (GI) and analyzed as grade 2+ and as grade 3+ for patients on the trial who received the combination of EBRT and BT (COMBO arm) compared to patients who received BT alone (BT arm). These results, which were recently published in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, suggest that BT should remain the standard of care for this population.

Many variations and intensifications of both EBRT and brachytherapy have been tested mainly in the higher and lower risk tiers of prostate cancer patients. Intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients represent a vast and heterogeneous grouping, which can make it difficult to find a specific therapy combination that appropriately treats their disease and the variety of risks that are possible within this population while avoiding added toxicity."

Jeff Michalski, Study Lead Author, Washington University Siteman Cancer Center

NRG-RTOG 0232 randomly assigned588 men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer to either the COMBO or the BT treatment arm and 579 were eligible/analyzed. The COMBO arm consisted of 287 patients versus 292 on the BT arm. The primary objective of the trial was to determine whether the combination of EBRT and BT improved 5-year FFP using the ASTRO definition. Secondary objectives of the trial included FFP using the Phoenix definition, biochemical failure (per ASTRO and Phoenix), disease-specific mortality, local progression, distant metastases, survival, and toxicity.

There was not a significant improvement with the COMBO treatment for 5-year FFP rates by both ASTRO and Phoenix definitions. The 5-year FFP-ASTRO rate (95% CI) was 86% (81-90) on the COMBO arm versus 83% (78-87) with on the BT arm. The 5-year FFP-Phoenix rate was 88% (84-92) on the COMBO arm versus 86% (81-90) on the BT arm. There were no differences between treatment arms for acute GU and GI toxicities; however, 5-year cumulative incidence of late grade 2 or higher GU/GI toxicities was 43% (37-49) in the COMBO arm and 26% (21-31) in the BT arm (p<0.0001). 5-year cumulative incidence for late grade 3 or higher GU/GI toxicities was 8% (5-12) in the COMBO arm and 4% (2-6) in the BT arm (p=0.006). There were no grade 5 GU/GI toxicities.

"Although these results favor brachytherapy alone as a standard of care, it is important to note that more research is needed to explore local treatment options for selected intermediate-risk patients that safely improves outcomes," added Dr. Michalski.

Further analysis is occurring for the quality-of-life secondary endpoint of the NRG-RTOG 0232 study. These data will be reported separately.

Supported by grants UG1CA189867 (NCORP), U10CA180868 (NRG Operations), U24CA180803 (IROC), and U10CA180822 (SDMC) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI).

Source:
Journal reference:

Michalski, J. M., et al. (2023). Effect of Brachytherapy With External Beam Radiation Therapy Versus Brachytherapy Alone for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: NRG Oncology RTOG 0232 Randomized Clinical Trial.  Journal of Clinical Oncology. doi.org/10.1200/jco.22.01856.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
What is the difference in risk of early prostate cancer death between men at higher vs lower genetic risk?