Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery provides improved overall survival compared to open lobectomy

Patients who underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) compared to open lobectomy had a significantly improved overall survival rate, according to a meta-analysis presented at the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer (IASLC) 2025 World Conference on Lung Cancer (WCLC).

Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is currently the most common approach to perform pulmonary lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer. Advantages include reduced pain, fewer complications, faster recovery and improved quality-of-life. The adoption of VATS lobectomy is based on proven non-oncological benefits.

According to Dr. Jacie Jiaqi Law, Royal Brompton Hospital, United Kingdom, none of the three largest contemporary randomized trials completed have been powered to detect a difference in overall or disease-free survival. Several meta-analyses of predominantly non-randomized studies have suggested a VATS approach leads to improved patient survival compared to thoracotomy, however findings are limited due to selection bias and confounding, Dr. Law reported.

To answer this important question, Dr. Law and fellow researchers sought to identify randomized trials comparing VATS and open lobectomy in early-stage lung cancer and obtain individual patient data from these trials to conduct a meta-analysis.

Of the 556 potential studies identified, only three were randomized trials that met the eligibility criteria: Bendixen et al. from Denmark (NCT01278888), Long et al. from China (NCT01102517) and Lim et al. from the United Kingdom (NCT03521375). Data on 1185 patients (586 randomized to VATS and 599 randomized to open lobectomy) was provided from the three trials.

The primary analysis indicated significantly improved overall survival for patients randomized to VATS compared to open lobectomy, pooled hazard ratio (HR) 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-0.96), representing a 21% reduction in the risk of death in the VATS lobectomy group. There was no difference in disease-free survival, pooled HR 0.91 (95% CI 0.75-1.12).

For the first time, we provide evidence that a simple change in surgical access to VATS reduces the overall risk of death by 21% without any compromise to disease-free survival. These results underscore the importance of prioritizing VATS when technically feasible as the access of choice for surgical resection of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer."

Dr. Jacie Jiaqi Law, Royal Brompton Hospital, United Kingdom

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Lavender oil could speed recovery after brain surgery