Esophageal cancer leaves a distinct metabolic signature in the gut

Researchers uncovered distinctive gut microbial patterns and hundreds of altered fecal metabolites in people with esophageal cancer, with lipid metabolism standing out as a key signature.

A woman holds her hand to the front of her neck, with a red and yellow glow highlighting the throat area to represent pain or discomfort.Study: Fecal metabolomic and microbiome profiling reveals lipid metabolic dysregulation in esophageal cancer. Image credit: PBXStudio/Shutterstock.com

A recent Scientific Reports study investigated associations between gut microbiota, fecal metabolic alterations, and esophageal cancer using advanced metabolomic and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing approaches.

Esophageal cancer: subtypes, risk factors, and clinical outlook

Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy and a leading cause of global cancer mortality. The two predominant histological subtypes, squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (AC), display pronounced geographic variation; SCC is particularly prevalent in China, while AC predominates in Western countries.

Small cell carcinoma remains rare but clinically significant. Risk factors include tobacco and alcohol use (primarily for SCC), chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease and Barrett’s esophagus (for AC), as well as dietary deficiencies, obesity, and genetic predisposition. The etiology is thus multifactorial, reflecting complex interactions among environmental, dietary, genetic, and gastroesophageal influences.

Early-stage esophageal cancer is often asymptomatic or presents with vague symptoms, leading to diagnosis at locally advanced or metastatic stages in 70–80% of patients. Despite advances in treatment, outcomes remain challenging. Consequently, deeper mechanistic insights are urgently needed to identify novel therapeutic targets and guide precision medicine approaches.

The gut microbiota, comprising trillions of microorganisms residing in the gastrointestinal tract, critically alters host physiology and disease progression. It influences cancer development by affecting nutrient metabolism, immune regulation, inflammatory signaling, and intestinal barrier integrity. Microbial dysbiosis is associated with diverse diseases.

High-throughput approaches such as 16S rRNA sequencing enable comprehensive characterization of microbiome composition and its links to disease states. In addition, metabolomics complements microbiome analysis by identifying disease-associated alterations in small-molecule metabolites, providing a functional readout of host-microbe interactions. Integrated microbiome and metabolomic profiling thus offers a powerful framework for exploring potential relationships between microbial and metabolic alterations in cancer.

Integrated gut microbiota and metabolic profiling in esophageal cancer

A total of 34 patients with esophageal cancer (stages I–IV) and 29 age-, gender-, and diet-matched healthy controls were enrolled at HuLunBuir People’s Hospital in 2024. Individuals with prior malignancy, recent gastrointestinal inflammation, relevant medication use, chronic digestive disorders, or significant metabolic and cardiopulmonary disease were excluded. The cancer patients had previously received palliative anti-tumor treatment, including radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, or combination regimens.

Fecal samples were collected for microbiome and metabolomic analyses, while serum tumor biomarkers were also measured. DNA from fecal samples was amplified for the 16S rRNA V3–V4 region with barcoded primers and sequenced using the Illumina NovaSeq platform. Microbial diversity was evaluated with established indices and statistical analyses.

Metabolomic profiling was conducted by extracting compounds from fecal samples and analyzing them via liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Differential metabolites were identified based on variable importance in projection (VIP) scores, t-tests, and false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Metabolite–microbiome correlations were assessed with Spearman’s rank correlation and visualized in Cytoscape. Esophageal tissue underwent histological analysis with hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Biomarkers, microbial shifts, and metabolic alterations in esophageal cancer

Biomarkers SCC, CYFRA21-1, and CA72-4 were significantly elevated in esophageal cancer patients, while CEA and CA19-9 showed no significant difference. Histological analysis revealed progressive cancer tissue infiltration from Stage I to Stage IV, with advanced stages displaying extensive squamous cell involvement and a transition from squamous epithelial hyperplasia to atypical hyperplasia in adjacent tissues.

16S rRNA gene sequencing identified 9 phyla, 13 classes, 27 orders, 45 families, 100 genera, and 147 species, with 6,513,919 valid reads (average 103,396 reads/sample). Several measures of alpha diversity differed significantly between esophageal cancer patients and controls, including Observed Features, Chao1, Faith PD, and Pielou Evenness, while Shannon and Simpson indices did not differ significantly. Beta diversity also differed significantly in overall microbial community structure between the groups.

The most abundant gut microbial phyla in esophageal cancer were Firmicutes (49.5%), Proteobacteria (17.1%), Verrucomicrobiota (12.6%), and Bacteroidota (10.0%). At the genus level, notable taxa included Akkermansia (12.6%), Escherichia-Shigella (8.9%), Subdoligranulum (5.8%), Blautia (5.1%), and Bacteroides (4.31%).

Compared to controls, esophageal cancer patients had higher abundances of Verrucomicrobiota, Actinobacteriota, Euryarchaeota, and Desulfobacterota, while Bacteroidota and Firmicutes were more prevalent in controls. Genera such as Akkermansia, Dialister, and Prevotella were enriched in cancer, whereas Bacteroides, Romboutsia, and Fusicatenibacter were higher in controls.

Metabolomic profiling revealed 792 differential metabolites, primarily involved in fatty acid, amino acid, and nucleic acid metabolism. Functional prediction using PICRUSt2 identified 30 differential predicted KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) pathways, mainly associated with steroid biosynthesis, fatty acid biosynthesis, glycerolipid metabolism, and amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism. Metabolomics also indicated enrichment in lipid metabolism pathways, including fatty acid transport, linoleic acid metabolism, and PPARA-mediated regulation of lipid metabolism.

Association analysis identified significant correlations between gut microorganisms and metabolites. Key bacterial clusters (Clostridia, Bacilli, Bacteroidota, Coriobacteriia) were linked with metabolites involved in GPCR (G protein-coupled receptor) signaling, vitamin transport, nucleoside metabolism, purine metabolism, and linolenic acid metabolism. Both positive and negative correlations were observed.

In an exploratory cross-sectional analysis stratified by cancer stage, the relative abundance of certain genera, particularly Prevotella and Alistipes, was higher in later-stage groups. However, the small number of patients within each stage, particularly the three patients with stage I disease, means these findings should be interpreted cautiously. Metabolites showing stage-associated patterns were mainly enriched in lipid metabolism pathways, especially glycerolipid and fatty acid metabolism.

Metabolic and microbial signatures in esophageal cancer progression

The current study identified distinct differences in serum biomarkers, gut microbiota composition, and metabolic profiles between people with esophageal cancer and healthy controls. Notably, significant dysregulation in lipid and amino acid metabolism, along with specific microbial and metabolic signatures, was associated with esophageal cancer and disease stage.

However, the researchers noted that the retrospective cross-sectional design, small sample size, prior anti-tumor treatment, and absence of standardized dietary control could have influenced the results. Dietary changes associated with advanced esophageal cancer, including shifts from solid to liquid diets, nutritional support, and reduced energy intake caused by progressive dysphagia, could also contribute to observed microbiome and metabolic differences.

Journal reference:
Dr. Priyom Bose

Written by

Dr. Priyom Bose

Priyom holds a Ph.D. in Plant Biology and Biotechnology from the University of Madras, India. She is an active researcher and an experienced science writer. Priyom has also co-authored several original research articles that have been published in reputed peer-reviewed journals. She is also an avid reader and an amateur photographer.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Bose, Priyom. (2026, October 01). Esophageal cancer leaves a distinct metabolic signature in the gut. News-Medical. Retrieved on October 01, 2026 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20261001/Esophageal-cancer-leaves-a-distinct-metabolic-signature-in-the-gut.aspx.

  • MLA

    Bose, Priyom. "Esophageal cancer leaves a distinct metabolic signature in the gut". News-Medical. 01 October 2026. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20261001/Esophageal-cancer-leaves-a-distinct-metabolic-signature-in-the-gut.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Bose, Priyom. "Esophageal cancer leaves a distinct metabolic signature in the gut". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20261001/Esophageal-cancer-leaves-a-distinct-metabolic-signature-in-the-gut.aspx. (accessed October 01, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Bose, Priyom. 2026. Esophageal cancer leaves a distinct metabolic signature in the gut. News-Medical, viewed 01 October 2026, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20261001/Esophageal-cancer-leaves-a-distinct-metabolic-signature-in-the-gut.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer matches conventional treatment outcomes