High Resolution BOLD Functional MRI Provides New Insights on Rat Brain

Introduction

Four-element array coils and high field small animal MR scanners can be used to obtain functional MRI, also known as fMRI, at a high spatial resolution of 75 x 75 x 1000 μm3. The activation area contains fine and detailed substructures, which can be identified at unparalleled in vivo resolution, thereby widening the scope and understanding of the origin and biophysical principles of blood-oxygenation-level dependent (BOLD) to get a better insight into structure and organization of the brain. In addition, deficit and recovery of functional brain following stroke and other brain diseases can be fully analyzed.

fMRI is used to examine brain activation in both animals and humans and aside from the traditional anatomical MRI, fMRI can give data regarding intactness and function of various regions in the brain and even workflow of information and neuronal pathways between these brain regions.

The BOLD effect is nothing but a quantitative technique through which the change of tiny local field disruptions of oxygenated hemoglobin [1] is measured at high temporal resolution. As a result, EPI sequence is often used to record the BOLD effect; EPI sequence is a rapid sequence that repetitively records the image slices of the rat brain in just 3 seconds or less. However, these EPI images of rat brain are characterized by distortion artifacts and low spatial resolution.

With advanced MRI technologies such as fast RF-readout electronics, high magnetic field strengths and multi-element array coils, high resolution functional MRI is now capable of detecting and distinguishing small volumes of activation at even sub-structures scale.

The results obtained provide a better understanding of:

  • The BOLD effect
  • Different aspects such as anesthesia protocols, animal models, imaging and stimulation parameters, and also analysis techniques
  • The brain’s (changing) structure
  • Brain reorganization and recovery after Alzheimer’s disease, stroke, and other brain  diseases

fMRI in small animals can be obtained in magnets from 4.7 to 11.7 Tesla[2,3]. Majority of analyses depend on the stimulation model of electrical stimulation of the forepaw on rats at 9.4 and 7.0 Tesla. Functional activation studies therefore have to be carried out on anesthetized animals. An α-chloralose protocol, the animal has to be kept still and the stimulus has to be simultaneously processed under this anesthetized condition. However, α-chloralose is known to cause severe side effects and hence, it is only used in acute experiments.

In these studies, a different but powerful method is employed using the sedative medetomidine[4]. This sedative enables the recovery of animals and thus can be used in line with the longitudinal experiments[5].

Experimental protocol

Coils and magnets:

  • Bruker BioSpec 7.0 Tesla
  • Linear surface coils
  • Linear Helmholtz coils
  • BioSpec 11.7 Tesla
  • Four-element or quadrature surface coils, and quadrature resonator

Sequence parameters:

  • Gradient-echo (GE) and spin-echo (SE) single-shot EPI with16.8–25.6 mm field-of-view
  • Matrix 64 (7.0 Tesla) to 256 (11.7 Tesla, four-element coil)
  • Resolution 75 to 400 μm, up to 16 adjacent slices of 0.5 to 2 mm thickness
  • Echo time 30 ms (SE) and 16 ms (GE)
  • Repetition time =3000 ms, 115 repetitions

Anesthesia:

Initiation with 1.5 to 2% isoflurane or halothane, gradual exchange against sedative agent.

Sedation:

  • Bolus injection of 0.5 ml of sedative mixture (0.3 ml Domitor® in 10 ml saline solution for a 300-gram rat)
  • Continuous injection of 1 ml every one hour

α2 adrenergic agonist medetomidine is the sedative agent.

Recovery:

  • Intraperitoneal injection of 0.3 ml Antisedan® for 300 gram rat
  • The α2 adrenergic antagonist atipamezole

Experimental specialties:

Special attention is paid during the transformation from anesthesia to sedation, to eliminate pain, noise, and movement. A temperature feedback system serves as an extremely handy tool because both sedative and anesthetic affect the auto-regulation of the rat’s body temperature. Finally, a sanitary pad is placed under the animal so that any increased urgency from the anesthetized animal can be absorbed.

Stimulation:

When the forepaw is electrically stimulated, the thalamus, and primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory corte are activated. To achieve this, electrical pulses (1–2 mA of 0.3 ms duration, at 6 or 3 Hz) are applied for 15 seconds after a resting period of 45 seconds, repeated 5 times. It takes 5 minutes and 45 seconds for the resultant total scan.

Analysis:

  • Stimulate”[6], “FSL”[7] or Bruker “FUN” program
  • Statistical t-test over activated periods against resting periods
  • BOLD activation is predicted to be 7 mm2 (GE) and 2 to 3 mm2 (SE) with a BOLD contrast of 1 to 3% for the S1 cortex in rats.

Results and discussion

A highly stable method for neuronal activation experiments in rodents is the BOLD fMRI using electrical forepaw stimulation. This method can also be integrated with other imaging methods like perfusion imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, and T2 imaging for lesion depiction. Different resolutions can be obtained based on the equipment, revealing the activation from an unresolved, small cluster to fine sub-structured areas.

Figure 1. BOLD activation at 7.0 Tesla on animals after stroke, with a resolution of 400 x 400 x 2000 μm3. T2-maps (left column) indicate the lesion on the right hemisphere. BOLD activation on the left healthy hemisphere (center column) and of the ischemic right hemisphere (right column) indicates transient loss of activation during the first two weeks following stroke, followed by full recovery at day 16.

Using older DBX electronics and linear surface coils at 7.0 Tesla, BOLD contrast with 400 x 400 x 2000 μm3 resolution can be obtained. Combined with T2-maps, loss of functional activity and its instant recovery as well as stroke lesion (Figure 1) was defined[4,5]. A combination of faster AVANCE II readout electronics, quadrature surface coil, and higher field strength of 11.7 Tesla increased both resolution and SNR to less than 200 x 200 x 2000 μm3, which is more than sufficient to identify the tiny structures along the neuronal activity pathway like the thalamus and secondary somatosensory cortex S2 (Figure 2) with BOLD contrast.

Matrices up to 256 x 256 were obtained with a four-element array coil, resulting in 75 x 75 x 1000 μm3 resolution. The activation becomes more resolved at this high resolution and allows the detection of sub-structures and shape in thalamus areas S1 and S2, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 2. BOLD activation at 11.7 Tesla using the quadrature surface coil with a resolution of (left) 300 x 300 x 2000 μm3 for high quality and (right) 150 x 200 x 2000 μm3 for high sensitivity.

Figure 3. High resolution BOLD activation at 11.7 Tesla using the four-element array coil with a resolution of 75 x 75 x 1000 μm3 for detection of (left) sub-structures within S1, and activation within other regions along the neuronal pathway: S2 and thalamus

Typically, BOLD contrast increases with higher field strength as a result of increased sensitivity. Owing to reduced effects of partial volume, the BOLD sensitivity is further enhanced by increased spatial resolution. When using the quadrature coil, it was observed that BOLD contrast increased from 1.5% at a resolution of 400 x 400 x 1000 μm3 to as high as 4% at 150 x 150 x 1000 μm3 at 11.7 Tesla.

Sub-structures can be easily detected at higher resolutions. At such resolutions, BOLD contrast reduced as a result of reduced SNR. However, in these analyses, an instant increase of BOLD contrast with field strength, seen up to 7.0 Tesla (Figure 4). which was no longer observed.

This is because of decreasing intravascular contributions as well as decreasing extravascular contributions from arterioles and venules. Short T2 values of blood explain these changes at such high field[3]. Yet, higher S/N is provided by increasing field strength, and when this S/N is invested into higher spatial resolution, it provides access to finer details of sub-structures and at the same time boosts the BOLD amplitude (due to less “dilution” by partial volume effect).

Figure 4. Comparison of BOLD activation (size and magnitude) for understanding the field dependence of the BOLD effect at 7.0 and 11.7 Tesla with a resolution of 400 x 400 x 2000 μm3

Summary and outlook

Together with recent coil technology and high magnetic fields, fMRI is capable of providing high-resolution images that help detect and differentiate small activation magnitudes and small and highly resolved activation areas on single-shot, high quality EPI images, even at the highest field strength. These results will benefit future studies on animal methods and models, which will provide a better insight into the brain structure and, most importantly, the brain function.

References

[1] Ogawa, S., Lee, T.M., Kay, A.R., Tank, D.W. Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. (1990) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.,USA 87: 9868-9872.

[2] Silva, A.C., Koretsky, A.P. Laminar specificity of functional MRI onset times during somatosensory stimulation in rat. (2002) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., USA 99: 15182-15187.

[3] Seehafer, J.U., Kalthoff, D., Beyrau, A., Farr, T.D., Wiedermann, D., Hoehn, M.Dependence of magnetic field strength on the BOLD effect using spin-echo and gradient-echo EPI at 7.0 and 11.7 Tesla. (2008) Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine 21: 326.

[4] Weber, R., Ramos-Cabrer, P., Wiedermann, D., van Camp, N., Hoehn, M. A fully noninvasive and robust experimental protocol for longitudinal fMRI studies in the rat. (2006) Neuroimage 29: 1303-1310.

[5] Weber, R., Ramos-Cabrer, P., Justicia, C., Wiedermann, D., Strecker, C.,Sprenger, C., and Hoehn, M. Early Prediction of Functional Recovery after Experimental Stroke: Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Electrophysiology, and Behavioral Testing in Rats. (2008) J. Neurosci. 28: 1022-1029.

[6] Strupp, J.P., Stimulate: A GUI based fMRI analysis software package. (1996) Neuroimage 3: S607.

[7] Smith, S.M., Jenkinson, M., Woolrich, M.W., Beckmann, C.F., Behrens, T.E., Johansen-Berg, H., Bannister, P.R., De Luca, M., Drobnjak, I., Flitney, D.E., Niazy, R.K., Saunders, J., Vickers, J., Zhang, Y., De Stefano, N., Brady, J.M., Matthews, P.M. Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. (2004) Neuroimage 23, Suppl 1: S208-219.

About Bruker

Bruker is market leader in analytical magnetic resonance instruments including NMR, EPR and preclinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Bruker's product portfolio in the field of magnetic resonance includes NMR, preclinical MRI ,EPR and Time-Domain (TD) NMR. In addition.

Bruker delivers the world's most comprehensive range of research tools enabling life science, materials science, analytical chemistry, process control and clinical research. Bruker is also the leading superconductor magnet and ultra high field magnet manufacturer for NMR and MRI solutions.


Sponsored Content Policy: News-Medical.net publishes articles and related content that may be derived from sources where we have existing commercial relationships, provided such content adds value to the core editorial ethos of News-Medical.Net which is to educate and inform site visitors interested in medical research, science, medical devices and treatments.

Last updated: Aug 4, 2017 at 7:20 AM

Other White Papers by this Supplier