NAT gains importance as traditional testing methods become inadequate

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

An expanding population of bacterial strains that are drug resistant, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), will be the most important justification for nucleic acid-based tests (NAT). According to "Infectious Disease Diagnostic Markets," a new report from leading life science market research company Kalorama Information, the most substantial growth in the $8.4 billion market for infectious disease diagnostics is in molecular testing.

The needs of infectious disease testing are such that the two traditional methods, culture-based assays and immunoassays, are becoming increasingly inadequate. One key reason for this is the increase in drug-resistant infections. Immunoassays have no analytical potential here and culture-based assays for bacterial susceptibility/sensitivity, though low cost, are slow and often difficult.

"Relevancy is established through significantly improved efficacy and not marginal improvement," says Bruce Carlson, publisher of Kalorama Information. "NAT testing can be put to many uses, but what will get it into more labs is its role in determining the genetic differences that make a bacterial strain such as MRSA or MDR-TB/XDR-TB drug resistant, with results in 2-4 hours."

This has allowed physicians to more rapidly select combination therapeutics for infections such as these. And in viral applications, for example in HIV infection, it has been equally valuable in detecting drug resistances that have developed in response to therapy.

What will cause immunoassays and culture-based assays to remain in the laboratory will be their relatively low cost. The cost of NAT assays, which are not usually analyzed outside the hospital lab, is still high at around $25-$35, while selective media cost about $5 a plate.

Laboratories are still largely equipped with immunoassay instrumentation, but not all have access to a thermal cycler or the expertise to perform a molecular MRSA test. And Kalorama expects replacement to be slow as a result of the recession. Therefore, both culture-based assays and immunoassays will hold ground with regard to infections disease tests that do not require rapid turn-around or are otherwise difficult to perform.

Kalorama Information's new report, "Infectious Disease Diagnostic Markets," focuses on products used for the diagnosis of bacterial and viral infections and addresses the significant impact that the rising threat of infections such as MRSA, swine flu and others are having on diagnostics. A market summary includes a total market analysis, key product summary, forecasts and a competitive analysis of leading companies.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study unveils novel bladder cancer diagnostic model based on key mitochondrial genes