Truvada deemed safe & effective in HIV infection risk reduction

Gilead Sciences Inc's Truvada pills are deemed safe and effective for reducing the risk of HIV infection, U.S. regulators said on Tuesday. But they recommended a cautious approach for using the drug in efforts to prevent the virus that causes AIDS.

According to the Food and Drug Administration Truvada - a combination of Gilead's HIV drugs Emtriva (also known as emtricitabine), and Viread (or tenofovir), which is already being used by patients with the human immunodeficiency virus, is well tolerated overall by uninfected people and may prevent infection in high-risk individuals when used in combination with other strategies. The FDA acknowledged a strong correlation between the drug's efficacy at reducing HIV infection and the willingness of those taking it to adhere to the treatment.

The FDA’s 47-page review document said preventive use of the drug should be weighed carefully against an individual's risk for infection, readiness to adhere to the treatment and potential for kidney problems. “The individual at risk may be spared infection with a serious and life-threatening illness that requires lifelong treatment,” the report said. Truvada represents a potential milestone in the evolution of the worldwide AIDS epidemic by offering a tablet capable of preventing infection. An estimated 1.2 million Americans have HIV, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In a 2010 landmark study in the New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found that giving a daily dose of Truvada to men who have sex with men can reduce HIV infection rates by 44 percent.

But other research shows that Truvada's high price makes it too costly to provide it to all homosexual and bisexual men, who account for more than half of the estimated 56,000 new infections annually in the United States. A team of researchers at Stanford University had estimated that giving a daily preventive dose of the drug to all U.S. men who have sex with men would cost $495 billion over 20 years in terms of the cost of drugs and healthcare visits.

The strategy would be far more effective if it targeted men who are at high risk of developing HIV because they have five or more sexual partners a year, they said. If just 20 percent of these high-risk individuals took the drug, the research team found, it could prevent 41,000 new infections over a period of 20 years at a cost of about $16.6 billion.

“If we're going to reduce the more than 50,000 new HIV infections in this country each year, we need to increase the available options for people,” said Ronald Johnson, AIDS United's vice president.

Researchers speculated that women may require a higher dose of the drug to prevent infection. They also said the disappointing results may have resulted from women not taking the pills consistently. “We know that if the person doesn't take the medication every day they will not be protected,” said Dr. Rodney Wright, director of HIV programs at Montefiore Medical Center in New York and chairman of the AIDS Health Foundation. “So the concern is that there may not be adequate adherence to provide protection in the general population.”

An outside panel of experts is scheduled to examine the FDA review documents on Thursday and make recommendations that U.S. health regulators will consider in deciding whether the drug should be used as a preventive treatment. Some experts have warned that the drug is only partly effective against HIV and that using it to prevent infection could cause protection from the virus to falter if patients fail to adhere to treatment.

FDA staff acknowledged that resistance is likely to occur among people who become infected while taking the drug. “The frequency of resistance might be minimized by limiting the duration of drug exposure after infection occurs,” the review document said.

The Boston-based Fenway Health Institute, which advocates for the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender communities, issued a statement calling on the FDA to approve the drug as a means of reducing the risk of HIV infection. “If the FDA approves the additional indication of the use of tenofovir-emtricitabine ... health programs and individuals will have improved choices,” the group said.

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Written by

Dr. Ananya Mandal

Dr. Ananya Mandal is a doctor by profession, lecturer by vocation and a medical writer by passion. She specialized in Clinical Pharmacology after her bachelor's (MBBS). For her, health communication is not just writing complicated reviews for professionals but making medical knowledge understandable and available to the general public as well.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Mandal, Ananya. (2018, August 23). Truvada deemed safe & effective in HIV infection risk reduction. News-Medical. Retrieved on June 26, 2019 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120509/Truvada-deemed-safe-effective-in-HIV-infection-risk-reduction.aspx.

  • MLA

    Mandal, Ananya. "Truvada deemed safe & effective in HIV infection risk reduction". News-Medical. 26 June 2019. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120509/Truvada-deemed-safe-effective-in-HIV-infection-risk-reduction.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Mandal, Ananya. "Truvada deemed safe & effective in HIV infection risk reduction". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120509/Truvada-deemed-safe-effective-in-HIV-infection-risk-reduction.aspx. (accessed June 26, 2019).

  • Harvard

    Mandal, Ananya. 2018. Truvada deemed safe & effective in HIV infection risk reduction. News-Medical, viewed 26 June 2019, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20120509/Truvada-deemed-safe-effective-in-HIV-infection-risk-reduction.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like... ×
Study finds significant increases in rapid ART initiation after adoption of WHO’s ‘Treat All’ policy