Training programs key factor for success in meeting current and future organizational talent requirements

As baby boomers retire in increasing numbers, developing engineering talent becomes a mission-critical process for companies across many industries. Top organizations have found that having the proper development programs in place is a key factor for success in developing and maintaining their pool of engineering talent. However, the data below from a Best Practices, LLC study encapsulates a key challenge facing companies: getting enough of their engineers to participate in these training programs.

  • Across companies, an average of 94% of all engineers are eligible to participate in formal technical training programs, while 56% participate
  • Continuing education programs have high average engineer eligibility at 91%, but these programs for the lowest participation rate of types benchmarked at 22%
  • Experienced-based training programs are the most selective with only 67% of engineers eligible on average, but nearly half - 31% -are participating

To better understand how world class companies optimize their engineering development programs to meet current and future organizational talent requirements, Best Practices, LLC published a research study that examines best-in-class engineering development programs.

The report, Best Practices for Developing World-Class Engineering Talent, identified innovative, cost-effective and world-class practices, processes and tools that a company can adopt to ensure that the workforce continues to meet its growth objectives within the current market.

The study is based on a research project involving a benchmark class of 28 technology-rich companies and includes leading aerospace, manufacturing and utility organizations.

The report examines the strategic importance, engineer eligibility, participation & relative effectiveness of:

  • Technical Training
  • Experience-Based Training
  • Continuing Education/ Reimbursement
  • Benchmarks for annual cost and hours of training provided per engineer in the workforce
  • Key sources of training materials
  • Pros & cons of standardizing curricula
  • Most effective metrics for measuring program success
  • Innovative, best-in-class processes, tools & technologies that increase training program effectiveness

SOURCE Best Practices, LLC

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

Sign in to keep reading

We're committed to providing free access to quality science. By registering and providing insight into your preferences you're joining a community of over 1m science interested individuals and help us to provide you with insightful content whilst keeping our service free.

or

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Research shows citrus and grape compounds may protect against type 2 diabetes