In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* preprint server, researchers demonstrated that irrespective of the type of anti-cancer treatment (ACT), severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection rates in patients receiving ACT remained comparable to the general population.
Study: Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP) - a longitudinal study of patients with cancer receiving active anti-cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic. Image Credit: goodbishop/Shutterstock
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Background
Globally, cancer patients under systemic ACT (SACT), due to their already suppressed immunity, remain vulnerable to SARS-CoV-2 infection and related severe illness. Studies have reported that patients with hematological cancers and solid organ cancers are at a higher risk of severe SARS-CoV-2 illness.
Moreover, studies examining cases of solid organ cancers have shown that male gender, increasing age, comorbidities, etc., are linked with higher coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mortality risk. However, previous studies could not establish a relationship between mortality and SACT.
Real-world, longitudinal data via studies with long follow-up periods are needed to examine lower or delayed immune responses in these patients to maintain anti-cancer care during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.
About the study
In the present longitudinal study, termed the Scottish COVID CAncer iMmunity Prevalence (SCCAMP), researchers evaluated the response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in 766 patients undergoing ACT during May 2020-October, 2021.
They sourced control data from Public Health Scotland (PHS) data sources; likewise, PHS provided information related to COVID-19 vaccination for the cancer cohort. More patient-related information, including cancer type, treatment, and clinical outcome, was accessed electronically from the National Records of Scotland (NRS).
The average age of the eligible study participants receiving ACT for a solid tumor was 62.7 years, and 66.5% were female. Of these, 79% were on cytotoxic chemotherapy, 14% were receiving immunotherapy, and the remaining 7% participants were receiving some other form of anti-cancer therapy, such as radiotherapy.
The researchers collected blood samples for standard-care reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) screening and a total SARS-CoV-2 antibody (immunoglobulin G (IgG), IgM, and IgA) assay to comprehensively assess COVID-19 infections and antibody response to infection and vaccination. The blood samples were collected every time patients attended ACT starting at baseline date (date of first sample collection) and serially after 1.5, three, six, and 12 months for follow-up studies.
During the study period, they detected 48 (6.3%) SARS-CoV-2-positives by RT-PCR; however, the antibody assay results raised this figure to 58 (7.6%) by diagnosing infection that occurred in some of the participants before vaccination.
Study findings
Until May 2021, the overall SARS-CoV-2 infection rate was similar in patients undergoing ACT and the age-matched general population. Notably, SARS-CoV-2 infection rates did not significantly change with the type of ACT. After May 2021, the observed SARS-CoV-2 infection rates in the general population were higher than in the SCCAMP cohort, suggesting a protective effect from vaccination.
The authors also noted a significant reduction in the number of SARS-CoV-2-positives among patients who had received two or more doses of any COVID-19 vaccination. Further, the authors noted that the observed COVID-19 mortality rates between those who died within 90 days of a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test and those who never contracted the infection were 10.4% and 10.6%, respectively.
Intriguingly, irrespective of the cause, the death rate was lowest among vaccinated patients of the cancer cohort. Moreover, all the patients who died after testing SARS-CoV-2-positive at any time during the study were unvaccinated.
After correcting for gender, age, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and the number of previous medications, multivariate analysis showed that vaccination was associated with a significantly reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection rate regardless of ACT. They observed hazard ratios (HRs) of 0.307 and 0.314 in vaccinated patients receiving chemotherapy and immunotherapy, respectively.
Furthermore, regardless of the type of cancer treatment, 96.3% of patients successfully generated anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies at some point after vaccination, as measured via total SARS-CoV-2 antibody assay.
Conclusions
To summarize, the study demonstrated that cancer patients undergoing ACT, specifically SACT, mounted a robust antibody response against SARS-CoV-2 infection after the COVID-19 vaccination.
According to the authors, the small number of cases in the study cohort, with relatively few lung cancer patients (a group considered at higher risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection), restricted them from making inferences about the overall risk. Nevertheless, they did not observe a higher SARS-CoV-2 risk in cancer patients on ACT compared to the regional population.
In addition, the observed rate of vaccination in the cancer cohort was quite high. Nearly 50% of patients had received a booster COVID-19 vaccination at the time of data censoring on October 31, 2021, compared to the general vaccination rate of 13.2% in Scotland at the time of the study. This further rationalizes why cancer patients on the ACT were not at high SARS-CoV-2 risk.
Future studies should evaluate immunological profiles of specific subgroups of this vulnerable population in greater detail, encompassing the trend of COVID-19 antibodies over time and the effect of ACT.
This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources
Article Revisions
- May 12 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Breakthrough imaging method enhances precision in prostate cancer treatment