Current and future strategies for vaccinating against invasive pneumococcal disease

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In a recent study published in the journal Npj Vaccines, researchers reviewed the immune mechanisms employed by existing vaccines for invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD).

Emerging vaccine strategies against the incessant pneumococcal disease
Study: Emerging vaccine strategies against the incessant pneumococcal disease. Image Credit: LookerStudio/

They discussed upcoming vaccine strategies, as well as challenges associated with serotype selectivity and the usage of pneumococcal-derived proteins as alternative antigens in vaccine development.


Despite the implementation of worldwide vaccination programs, IPD caused by the bacterial pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae, continues to cause widespread illness and has a fatality rate of close to 5%. Streptococcus pneumoniae asymptomatically colonizes the host nasopharynx and subsequently causes invasive disease since the human immune system’s ability to counteract S. pneumoniae virulence factors such as the capsular polysaccharide (CPS) coat protein is reduced.

The ability of the bacterium to use the heterogeneous monosaccharide building blocks of CPS and link and modify them also results in serotyping, with almost 90% of all IPD cases being attributed to 20 to 25 serotypes. The common manifestations of IPD are lung infection and pneumonia, with continued infection resulting in acute blood infection, bacteremia, septicemia, and infections of the spinal cord and brain, and eventually meningitis. IPD in patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) or influenza also increases the fatality rate.

Given the fact that IPD still accounts for a substantial proportion of lower respiratory infections (15 cases out of every 100,000 people every year) with about 1.1 million fatalities each year, the development of more effective vaccines against S. pneumoniae continues to be a priority.

Existing pneumococcal vaccines

The primary immune clearance method of pneumococcal colonization is phagocytosis, and the CPS inhibits complement activation and helps S. pneumoniae evade immune clearance. However, the distinct structure of CPS and its surface exposure also provide vaccines with a suitable antigen to target and induce opsonophagocytic clearance of the bacteria.

The initiation of vaccination programs in the 20th century using the CPS expressed in the most prevalent serotypes has seen considerable success. However, the use of bacterial-derived, purified CPS cannot initiate the host’s adaptive immune response and only generates low-affinity, short-lived immunoglobulin M (IgM) responses that wane in six months.

CPS antigens can only be recognized by specific B cells, resulting in the secretion of IgM antibodies, with no activation of T-cell-induced antibody class switching and affinity maturation, leading to an absence of the memory B or T cells required for long-term protection.

Glycoconjugate vaccine technology, in which CPS is conjugated with a carrier protein with immunogenic properties, has helped induce adaptive immune responses that target CPS, causing class switching of IgM to IgG and affinity maturation, resulting in immune memory. However, despite their success in inducing long-term immunity, the inconsistencies across different vaccine batches and variations in immunogenicity continue to present challenges.

The development of conjugate vaccines also presents some hurdles since CPS is chemically activated for the carrier protein to be covalently attached to it, and this activation method could play a deleterious role. Furthermore, the non-specific conjugation of CPS and the carrier protein could result in an inability to present the key antigens to the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). Current vaccine technology is focused on the formulation of conjugate vaccines where the structural homogeneity and immunogenicity are not affected.

A recently developed 10-valent conjugate vaccine — Pneumosil, which does not use the peroxide oxidation method to attach CPS to the carrier protein covalently — has shown comparable efficacy to other approved pneumococcal vaccines.

Another 24-valent vaccine, VAX-24, conjugates CPS with a proprietary carrier protein, which is modified to allow site-selective conjugation and enriches the CPS conjugate epitope sites while keeping the tertiary structure of CPS intact.

The researchers also discussed other recent vaccine formulations that aim to circumvent the challenges presented by the traditional conjugation methods. Furthermore, the heterogeneity in the prevalence of serotypes across the globe and the problem of capsular switching, which present further challenges to the development of effective pneumococcal vaccines, were also discussed.

Alternate antigen targets

The focus of vaccine technology on CPS and serotype-specific vaccines reduces the scope of vaccine application since it can only induce immunity against the specific serotypes included in the formulation.

The emergence of non-encapsulated S. pneumoniae strains is also involved in the increased incidence of IPD cases. The researchers suggest a different approach in which vaccines target conserved surface proteins of S. pneumoniae.

Proteins such as pneumolysin, a cholesterol-dependent cytolysin, have long been studied and have been found in every S. pneumoniae strain that causes IPD.

While full-length pneumolysin protein was found to protect against a wide range of S. pneumoniae serotypes, it was also associated with cytotoxicity. However, mutated versions of pneumolysin with reduced toxicity, as well as other proteins such as pneumococcal surface protein A and pneumococcal histidine triad surface protein D are promising potential vaccine antigen targets.


To summarize, the review discussed the existing state of pneumococcal vaccines and the challenges related to serotype heterogeneity, vaccine conjugation processes, and capsular switching. These challenges continue to present roadblocks to developing vaccines that are effective against a wide range of S. pneumoniae serotypes whilst providing long-lasting immunity.

The researchers also discussed other potential vaccine antigens, such as surface proteins that are conserved across numerous S. pneumoniae strains.

Journal reference:
Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Written by

Dr. Chinta Sidharthan

Chinta Sidharthan is a writer based in Bangalore, India. Her academic background is in evolutionary biology and genetics, and she has extensive experience in scientific research, teaching, science writing, and herpetology. Chinta holds a Ph.D. in evolutionary biology from the Indian Institute of Science and is passionate about science education, writing, animals, wildlife, and conservation. For her doctoral research, she explored the origins and diversification of blindsnakes in India, as a part of which she did extensive fieldwork in the jungles of southern India. She has received the Canadian Governor General’s bronze medal and Bangalore University gold medal for academic excellence and published her research in high-impact journals.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. (2023, August 23). Current and future strategies for vaccinating against invasive pneumococcal disease. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 19, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Current and future strategies for vaccinating against invasive pneumococcal disease". News-Medical. 19 April 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Sidharthan, Chinta. "Current and future strategies for vaccinating against invasive pneumococcal disease". News-Medical. (accessed April 19, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Sidharthan, Chinta. 2023. Current and future strategies for vaccinating against invasive pneumococcal disease. News-Medical, viewed 19 April 2024,


The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Balancing diets: study reveals plant protein's impact on nutrient levels in Americans