Grassley inquiry into fast-tracking of Avastin drug applications could hurt cancer drug development, patients

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Sen. Chuck Grassley's (R-Iowa) request that the Government Accountability Office investigate whether FDA acted appropriately in granting "accelerated approval" to a cancer drug "will have a catastrophic effect on America's ability to develop new drugs," Mark Thornton, a former medical officer in FDA's Office of Oncology Drug Products and president of the Sarcoma Foundation of America, writes in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece.

The drug, Avastin, was granted accelerated approval for treating women with metastatic breast cancer after showing early evidence of an effect on the "surrogate endpoint" known as "progression-free survival," according to Thornton.

Grassley "implied in his GAO request that something sinister occurred during the FDA's premarket deliberations and that surrogate endpoints were the new bogeyman," Thornton writes, adding, "Nothing could be further from the truth." He states that evaluating a cancer drug's effect on surrogate endpoints, as opposed to impact on overall survival, to potentially allow "expedited" approval of drugs has "won near-universal acceptance within the cancer community."

Grassley "is demanding a full-scale review of each and every product ever approved and is asking for a re-judgment by GAO 'to ensure that drugs approved on surrogate endpoints are both safe and effective,'" according to Thornton. However, the senator's "bully tactics" could cause cancer drug development to "slow to an absolute crawl" because the "extremely cautious and protective" FDA "will respond to such intimidation by being even more protective," Thornton writes.

He adds, "U.S. cancer drug development stands on a precipice overlooking a new dark age in which each new product's development is longer and costlier than the last," and drug makers may "decide it is not financially viable to even bother developing new drugs." Thornton writes, "Mr. Grassley's legacy could be thousands of additional cancer deaths" (Thornton, Wall Street Journal, 5/29).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Breast cancer survivors at higher risk of developing second cancers