Daschle gives health reform 50-50 chance of passing

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Even as President Barack Obama set August as a "make-or-break" deadline for overhauling the health care system, Tom Daschle, initally tapped by Obama to run the reform effort, predicted a "50-50 chance that something's going to pass."

The former Senate majority leader spoke Tuesday at the National Press Club, where he debated Michael Leavitt, who served as secretary of health and human services under President George W. Bush.

During the Clinton adminstration, Daschle explained, many of his colleagues on both sides of the aisle made optimistic predictions about a health overhaul, but "15 years later, we know how wrong that was." Based on his prior experiences in Congress, he said, the chances this year are "no better than 50-50," although he'd "like to think it's better than that."

Leavitt had a different take on the issue, saying there is a "political imperative" for some kind of change. But he predicted that any final legislation would represent an "incremental approach" that might include a Medicaid expansion.

Early in the debate, Daschle and Leavitt managed to find common ground on a number of issues, but later sparred over whether a public plan option should be included. Leavitt called the public plan a "Trojan Horse" that used words like "competition" and "choice" but would result in some employers' dropping coverage, denying millions of Americans the option of a private plan. Daschle responded by saying lawmakers would have to decide whether they are "designing this system for the insurance companies" or for the American people. "It's hard for me to understand how you can be a proponent of choice but an opponent of greater choice," he added, referring to those who support an insurance market with several private options but no public plan.

Daschle and Leavitt agreed that the government has a major role to play in improving the health care system. They also agreed that removing the tax exclusion for employer-sponsored health care benefits could be a fair and cost-effective way to pay for an overhaul.

By Jenny Gold, The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Neurological Narratives: A Journey into Women's Brain Health Research