NOTA questions FDA's attempted regulation of on-site tests

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The National On-site Testing Associates, Inc. (NOTA) has been revived in response to an attempt by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate on-site, or point of collection, oral fluids drug and alcohol tests used by many small employers for non-medical purposes. NOTA is an association of manufacturers, users, and distributors of on-site drugs of abuse tests. These tests are sold throughout the world for use in workplace, sports, school, insurance, and criminal justice settings and numerous other non-medical applications. These tests are safe, accurate, cost effective, and easy to use.

“The FDA's unneeded regulation will restrain the advance of this valuable technology, unduly expend taxpayer dollars, and divert valuable FDA resources from critical concerns such as expediting drug approvals, monitoring food quality, and fighting terrorism's threat to our food supply”

“The FDA's unneeded regulation will restrain the advance of this valuable technology, unduly expend taxpayer dollars, and divert valuable FDA resources from critical concerns such as expediting drug approvals, monitoring food quality, and fighting terrorism's threat to our food supply,” noted David Evans, the Executive Director of NOTA. “In the past, serious questions about the FDAs jurisdiction to regulate on-site tests have been raised by Congress and other federal agencies.”

“The FDA claims jurisdiction over on-site drug tests because they now define on-site oral fluids drug tests as “medical” or "diagnostic” devices, however, the FDA has no jurisdiction over drug testing unless the testing is intended to be used for the diagnosis of disease to treat a disease. On-site testing in the workplace is not "medical" or "diagnostic" testing. The employer, or school administrator, or probation officer who uses on-site drug tests is often the first line of defense in the deterrence of drug use. They are not used for a medical diagnosis but to prevent drug use,” stated Evans.

Employers use these tests for non-medical purposes such as:

1. To promote an orderly work environment and deter drug use.

2. To provide a cost effective method to reduce employer costs associated with drug abuse.

3. To discourage illegal or immoral conduct by employees.

4. To promote workplace safety.

“The FDA regulatory costs will be passed on to the thousands of small businesses who use these tests,” noted Evans. “This money could be better spent to hire new employees.”

Source:

National On-site Testing Associates, Inc.

Comments

  1. Gary Neumann Gary Neumann United States says:

    If I want to do on-site testing for my business I should be allowed to do it. There is nothing diagnostic about it. If your taking drugs you will not get hired. If your taking drugs you will be fired.  I think they should do on-site drug testing for anyone who receives any type of compensation from the government, welfare, unemployment etc. No money if your on drugs. Sorry. Find something better to do with your time than messing with small business. What's next the Green Police.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study unveils novel bladder cancer diagnostic model based on key mitochondrial genes