ConvaTec, a world-leading developer and marketer of innovative medical technologies for community and hospital care, today announced new study results that demonstrate hospitals could realize substantial savings by substituting Flexi-Seal® FMS for traditional fecal management methods. The cost savings are mainly due to a reduction in time required for nursing staff to manage fecal incontinence. This study was presented at the 23rd Annual Symposium on Advanced Wound Care and Wound Healing Society (SAWC/WHS) in Orlando, Florida.
Fecal incontinence is common in hospital intensive care units (ICU) and presents a major challenge for healthcare professionals due to its association with skin breakdown, which may increase the risk of infection. Traditional methods for liquid or semiliquid fecal incontinence management, such as the use of absorbent briefs/pads, skin cleansers, and moisturizers, are only moderately successful in alleviating the consequences of fecal incontinence.
A budget impact model was developed to calculate the annual financial implications of using Flexi-Seal® FMS versus traditional fecal management methods in a hospital ICU. Costs of consumables, nurse and nursing assistant time and of treating fecal incontinence-related complications were considered. The average cost per patient per course of diarrhea was calculated for average-weight and bariatric patients. All figures were collected retrospectively from Carondelet St. Mary's an Ascension Hospital, Tucson, AZ.
Results found the average total fecal management costs per patient, per five-day course of diarrhea, including consumables and nursing time only were $423 for Flexi-Seal® FMS patients and $763 for traditional fecal management patients. The annualized burden of ICU fecal incontinence in this hospital (223 patients) was $169,896 using traditional fecal management methods and $94,224 using Flexi-Seal® FMS. The annual savings from Flexi-Seal® FMS adoption were $75,763 by the hospital.
A chart review found that no patients with Flexi-Seal® FMS developed pressure ulcers related to fecal incontinence. However, the reduction in pressure ulcer incidence may not be attributable to use of Flexi-Seal® FMS. A "SKIN Bundle" program, which increased awareness of skin breakdown, was initiated at the same time. Since the potential effects of Flexi-Seal® FMS and the "SKIN Bundle" program on pressure ulcer incidence cannot be separated, the cost reduction due to reduced incidence of pressure ulcers was not included in the budget impact estimation.
Nursing resources key to improving patient experience ratings