Genetic endowment, family dynamics play a large role in athletic development

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The Journal of Athletic Training, the National Athletic Trainers' Association's (NATA) scientific publication, released today Early Single Sport Specialization in a High-Achieving U.S. Athlete Population: Comparing National Collegiate Athletic Association Student-Athletes and Undergraduate Students in their special thematic issue focused on youth sport specialization.

The study compared Division I student athletes (SA) and noncollegiate athletes (NA) who had competed in youth sports. The study found that parents and siblings of Division I student athletes (SA) were more likely to have been high-achieving athletes, while other factors previously thought to be imperative, such as the age of single sport specialization and birth month, were not significantly different. This suggests that genetic endowment, family and/or environmental dynamics play a large role in athletic development, beyond that of deliberate practice alone.

The 'deliberate practice model' implies that the accumulation of a large volume of sport specific training exclusively will lead to long term success. It has been a driving force for single sport specialization at an early age. However, it doesn't take into account key elements such as genetics, family and social support structures."

John P. DiFiori, MD, FACSM, FAMSSM, lead author, director of sports medicine for the National Basketball Association and chief of Primary Sports Medicine for the Hospital for Special Surgery (NY).

Key stats

  • The SAs specialized in a single sport at an older age (15.38 years old versus 14.30 years old).
  • The parents of SAs were more likely to have participated in collegiate (32.4% versus 8.4%) and professional sports (10.9% versus 1.3%).
  • Neither birth month nor the age of sport initiation differed between groups age of sport initiation (7.16 years old versus 7.71 years old)
  • Both groups participated in multiple sports in childhood (SAs 3.9 sports, NAs 3.2 sports).
  • 88% of the SAs in the study participated in more than one youth sport.

"This study supports others, which show that although sport-specific skill development is essential, it alone does not ensure high-level success. And while there is growing data that indicates that participating in multiple youth sports is important, this study is unique in that both groups participated in more than one sport. The finding that was clearly different was the level of sport achievement among family members," he added.

The study consisted of 273 Division I SA and 155 NA that had been involved in competitive youth sports before entering the university. Overall, the results are not consistent with deliberate practice theory, which states that performance is directly related to and constrained by the accumulated amount of highly structured activity. This study points toward an alternative model that includes not only sport-specific skill development but also genetic and social factors as key elements of long-term sport achievement.

Source:
Journal reference:

DiFiori, J.P., et al. (2019) Early Single Sport Specialization in a High-Achieving US Athlete Population: Comparing National Collegiate Athletic Association Student-Athletes and Undergraduate Students. Journal of Athletic Training. doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-431-18.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
ACMG releases new Points to Consider statement on the clinical utility of polygenic risk scores for embryo selection