Anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer trends over 15 months in healthcare workers in Boston

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In a recent study posted to the medRxiv* preprint server, researchers assessed the changes in the immunoglobulin (Ig) titers against the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike (S) protein of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) post-vaccination and natural SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers (HCW) of Boston.

Study: 15-month follow-up of anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers in Boston, MA. Image Credit: Kateryna Kon/Shutterstock
Study: 15-month follow-up of anti-spike receptor binding domain (RBD) SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among healthcare workers in Boston, MA. Image Credit: Kateryna Kon/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Previous studies have reported the durability of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies up to six months post-vaccination. However, the serological trends beyond six months of vaccination in individuals with and without coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) history and its correlation with the extent of immune protection are unknown.

About the study

In the present study, researchers conducted a questionnaire survey-based analysis to determine the durability of vaccine-induced and prior COVID-19-induced changes in antibody titers over 15 months among HCWs of Boston’s Medical Center (BMC).

The study commenced in July 2020, and follow-ups were conducted in December 2020, March 2021, June 2021, and September 2021. Participants were classified into different groups based on the COVID-19 history and vaccination status, including subjects with COVID-19 history before vaccination, those with COVID-19 history post-vaccination, vaccinated without COVID-19 history, unvaccinated without COVID-19 history, and unvaccinated with COVID-19 history.

A total of 527 HCWs provided data on their comorbidities, reverse-transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) reports, and symptoms three months before the study. The self-reported RT-PCR reports and vaccination status were confirmed by electronic medical records (EMR). Serum was obtained at the beginning and the end of the study. The serum anti-S RBD IgG, anti-nucleocapsid IgG, and anti-S IgM titers were evaluated every three months.

Results

Most of the HCWs were women (77%) and worked as physicians (32%) or nurses (41%). The titers of the unvaccinated HCWs without COVID-19 history remained below the threshold of seropositivity and were lost on follow-up evaluations in June 2021. The unvaccinated subjects with COVID-19 history demonstrated anti-S IgG fluctuations that corresponded to the dates of SARS-CoV-2 infections.  

In July 2020, the mean titers for HCWs with COVID-19 before being vaccinated was 233 AU/mL, which increased by December 2020 to 375 AU/mL and remarkably increased further by March 2021 to 25,535 AU/mL, corresponding to the major vaccine uptakes. Between March and June 2021, the titers decreased to 8,342 AU/mL, followed by a further diminution to 4,463 AU/mL by September 2021, with an overall 83% seropositivity decline.

For most HCWs, the titers persisted above the seropositivity threshold for anti-S RBD IgG for a minimum of nine months post-vaccination, irrespective of infection history. Interestingly, HCWs with COVID-19 history before being vaccinated had substantially higher mean antibody titers on every follow-up compared to those without COVID-19.

Most vaccinated HCWs without COVID-19 history demonstrated peak titers (10,012 AU/mL) during March 2021, corresponding to major vaccine uptakes. However, the titers decreased by June 2021 to 2,406 AU/mL and further decreased to 999 AU/mL with an overall decrease of 90%. The subjects with COVID-19 history before being fully vaccinated had substantially altered mean titers of 25,112 AU/mL compared to those vaccinated without COVID-19 history (10,083 AU/mL).

Twelve subjects selected for an ongoing trial of Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination were vaccinated between August 2020 and September 2020. In these participants, titers of 4,685 AU/mL were detected in the December 2020 follow-up. However, by September 2021, 11 months post-vaccination, the titers declined to 370 AU/mL with an overall 92% decrease.

During March 2021, the titers for HCWs with COVID-19 history post minimum one vaccination increased to 8,446 AU/mL but declined by June 2021 to 1,812 AU/mL and further decreased by September 2021 to 989 AU/mL with an overall 88% decrease.

Eight of the 11 participants with breakthrough infections were SARS-CoV-2 positive during the vaccination period. There were three true breakthrough COVID-19 cases, with varying titers and symptoms (between 1,038 and 8,626 AU/mL). Interestingly, respondents with the least titers reported the most symptoms (runny nose, dyspnea, cough, and headache). This indicates that the severity of symptoms in breakthrough cases could be correlated with the serum titers. Additionally, an overall breakthrough case rate of 0.9% in the HCWs, all of whom had mild COVID-19, is indicative of vaccine efficacy.

Conclusion

To summarize, although the anti-S IgG titers persisted above the seropositivity threshold for 11 months after vaccination and 15 months after infection, they variably declined in patients differing in their vaccination status and history of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Notably, the titers were highest among HCWs with COVID-19 history before vaccination.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 12 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Written by

Pooja Toshniwal Paharia

Dr. based clinical-radiological diagnosis and management of oral lesions and conditions and associated maxillofacial disorders.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. (2023, May 12). Anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer trends over 15 months in healthcare workers in Boston. News-Medical. Retrieved on May 01, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220324/Anti-spike-SARS-CoV-2-antibody-titer-trends-over-15-months-in-healthcare-workers-in-Boston.aspx.

  • MLA

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer trends over 15 months in healthcare workers in Boston". News-Medical. 01 May 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220324/Anti-spike-SARS-CoV-2-antibody-titer-trends-over-15-months-in-healthcare-workers-in-Boston.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. "Anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer trends over 15 months in healthcare workers in Boston". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220324/Anti-spike-SARS-CoV-2-antibody-titer-trends-over-15-months-in-healthcare-workers-in-Boston.aspx. (accessed May 01, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Toshniwal Paharia, Pooja Toshniwal Paharia. 2023. Anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 antibody titer trends over 15 months in healthcare workers in Boston. News-Medical, viewed 01 May 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220324/Anti-spike-SARS-CoV-2-antibody-titer-trends-over-15-months-in-healthcare-workers-in-Boston.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
AI in healthcare shows promise in trials but needs real-world testing to ensure effectiveness