Study quantifies the likelihood of future COVID-19 following natural infection or vaccination

Since COVID-19 vaccines first became available to protect against infection and severe illness, there has been much uncertainty about how long the protection lasts, and when it might be necessary for individuals to get an additional booster shot.

Now, a team of scientists led by faculty at the Yale School of Public Health and the University of North Carolina at Charlotte has an answer: strong protection following vaccination is short-lived.

The study is the first to quantify the likelihood of future infection following natural infection or vaccination by the Moderna, Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson, or Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines. The findings are published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

The risk of breakthrough infections, in which a person becomes infected despite being vaccinated, depends on the vaccine type. According to the study, current mRNA vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna) offer the greatest duration of protection, nearly three times as long as that of natural infection and the Johnson & Johnson and Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccines.

The mRNA vaccines produce the highest levels of antibody response and in our analysis confer more durable protection than other vaccines or exposures. However, it is important to remember that natural immunity and vaccination are not mutually exclusive. Many people will have partial immunity from multiple sources, so understanding the relative durability is key to deciding when to provide a boost to your immune system."

Jeffrey Townsend, the Elihu Professor of Biostatistics at Yale School of Public Health and the study's lead author

Dependable protection against reinfection requires up-to-date boosting with vaccines that are adapted to address changes in the virus that occur as part of its natural evolution over time, the researchers said.

"We tend to forget that we are in an arms race with this virus, and that it will evolve ways to evade both our natural and any vaccine-derived immune response," said Alex Dornburg, assistant professor at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte, who led the study with Townsend. "As we have seen with the Omicron variant, vaccines against early virus strains become less effective at combating new strains of the virus."

The researchers' data-driven model of infection risks through time takes advantage of the striking similarities of reinfection probabilities between endemic coronaviruses (which cause "common colds") and SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19. These similarities allowed the scientists to make longer-term projections than studies focused solely on current-day infections. Furthermore, the model placed antibody responses following natural and vaccine-mediated immunity into the same context, enabling comparison.

"SARS-CoV-2 mirrors other endemic coronaviruses that also evolve and reinfect us despite natural immunity to earlier strains," said Townsend. "Continual updating of our vaccinations and booster shots is critical to our fight against SARS-CoV-2."

Funding for the research was provided by the National Science Foundation.

Journal reference:

Townsend, J.P., et al. (2022) The durability of natural infection and vaccine-induced immunity against future infection by SARS-CoV-2. PNAS.


  1. Mark Paul Dennison Mark Paul Dennison Austria says:

    In the light of a coronavirus mutating as normal, we are supposed to re-vaccinate like anything? What about the risks of that unproven strategy, of making your system think it faces such a massive threat from Covid by such large repeated antibody responses - when many natural infections probably get beaten in the nose instead? What about the cost of that strategy, given the vast majority of people don't need it? It's conclusion is medically, scientifically and economically illiterate and goes unchallenged. Presumably only because blind mass vaccination might provide a route to unprecedented Government control, so it is cheered on with every opportunity. Which is disgraceful.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New study highlights impact of sleep disturbances on COVID-19 and long COVID