Rapid testing technology identifies trace drug contamination in public spaces

The study, published in the Journal of Mass Spectrometry, tested the method in a working UK pub and found traces of cocaine and ketamine on surfaces across bathrooms, tables and bar areas.

The technique, atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry (ASAP-MS), skips the chromatographic separation step that traditional methods require - where a sample is first sorted into its individual ingredients before being identified in a lab. A sample is introduced via a glass capillary rod into a heated source, vaporized by nitrogen gas, and ionized without separation.

Analysis takes under two minutes, and that speed and simplicity could make rapid, on-site drug screening practical for venues, crime scenes or other locations where quick turnaround matters.

Whether we like it or not, drugs are part of daily life and are often present where nobody can see them. Behind every one of these traces are people - staff who clean those bathrooms and work those shifts, and customers who have no idea what is on the surfaces they touch. When a venue can find out within minutes what is there, action can be taken that same night to protect them. Staff don't have to wait days for a laboratory result while the risk goes on unseen."

Andriana Michailidis, lead author and PhD student, University of Surrey

Over three weeks, the Surrey team collected 420 surface swabs from a single pub in the south of England. They tested three distinct workflows - direct untargeted analysis of swabs with no sample preparation, untargeted analysis of solvent-extracted samples, and targeted analysis monitoring specific chemical signatures. The targeted method using solvent-extracted samples achieved an overall diagnostic accuracy of 64.29 per cent for cocaine and 83.81 per cent for ketamine, compared against confirmatory laboratory testing.

The study found cocaine on all sampled bathroom surfaces using all three workflows. Concentrations were highest in bathroom areas, consistent with prior research showing that public bathrooms in venues are frequently used for substance consumption. The method identified very small amounts of cocaine and ketamine using the targeted approach.

The lowest levels were 20 picograms per microlitre for cocaine and 0.78 nanograms per microlitre for ketamine. Twenty picograms is about a millionth of the weight of a single human hair. Spread through a microlitre, which is a droplet far smaller than a pinhead, it is vastly less than anyone could see or feel. The ketamine figure is about 40 times higher than the cocaine figure, but it is still roughly a billionth of a gram in a droplet too small to see clearly.

Dr Patrick Sears, corresponding author from the University of Surrey's School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, said:

"Atmospheric solids analysis probe mass spectrometry offers a practical bridge between the speed needed for field screening and the sensitivity required to detect drugs at trace levels. What excites us about this work is proving that a portable system can perform usefully in realistic, uncontrolled environments. This matters for venue safety, for occupational health monitoring of staff, and for understanding surface contamination where it actually occurs."

Ketamine proved more challenging to detect than cocaine because it remains trapped in cotton swab fibres and has lower volatility, meaning it vaporizes more slowly during analysis. Direct analysis of swabs missed significant amounts of ketamine that were later confirmed by traditional laboratory testing. Solvent extraction recovered those trapped compounds but added preparation time. The researchers identified 15 false positives across the three workflows, some attributed to procaine - a cutting agent occasionally mixed with cocaine - which produces a nearly identical chemical signature to ketamine.

The study is among the first to assess surface contamination in an operational venue and to test whether portable mass spectrometry could serve as a practical detection tool for public health or occupational safety applications.

Source:
Journal reference:

Michailidis, A., et al. (2026). Assessing the use of ASAP‐MS for Screening a UK Pub for Illicit Drug Substances. Journal of Mass Spectrometry. DOI: 10.1002/jms.70121. https://analyticalsciencejournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jms.70121

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Is there a best day to take GLP-1 drugs? Researchers looked for an answer