Justice Department intervenes to protect civil rights of the mentally ill in New York

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The Justice Department today filed a motion to intervene in Disability Advocates Inc. v. David A. Paterson, et al. in federal court in the Eastern District of New York. The United States alleges that the state of New York has failed to house thousands of individuals with mental illness who currently reside in large, institutional "adult homes" in the most integrated setting, in violation of Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act. An integrated setting is a setting that enables individuals with disabilities to interact with nondisabled persons to the fullest extent possible.

On Sep. 8, 2009, the district court ruled that the state discriminated against individuals with mental illness residing in adult homes, in violation of the integration mandate of the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act. The case has entered a stage where the court will determine a remedy for the violations. The United States now seeks to participate in crafting that remedy.

"As the Supreme Court determined in the landmark Olmstead v. L.C. case, unjustified institutionalization stigmatizes individuals with disabilities as unworthy of participation in community life," said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Rights Division. "New York successfully provides community-based housing, such as scattered site apartments with supportive services, for individuals just like those currently residing in adult homes, and should provide the same opportunity for adult home residents."

"By moving to intervene in this case, we seek to support the development of an appropriate court-ordered remedy to ensure that the civil rights of individuals with mental illness in the city and state of New York are appropriately protected," said Benton J. Campbell, U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District of New York.

The full and fair enforcement of the ADA and its mandate to integrate individuals with disabilities is a major priority of the Civil Rights Division. The ADA protects individuals with disabilities from discrimination by public entities. People interested in finding out more about the ADA can call the Justice Department's toll-free ADA Information Line at 1-800-514-0301 or 1-800-514-0383 (TTY), or access its ADA Web site at http://www.ada.gov.

SOURCE U.S. Department of Justice

Comments

  1. Harold A. Maio Harold A. Maio United States says:

    Olmstead vs.. L.C is actually Olmstead vs. Lois Curtis and Elaine Wilson, two women held  by Olmstead in a state mental institution long after they were cited for release.

    Their names were taken from them by the agency "representing" them in their lawsuit -without their permission or want. It is an example of "restrictive" environment: Atlanta Legal Aid restricted them from name.

    Atlanta Legal Aid never corrected its error, nor acknowledged it. Unlike Rosa Parks their names will never enter legal education, or legal citations in other suits. They will remain abstracted to initials.

    Harold A. Maio, retired Mental Health Editor

    [email protected]

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Phase 2 trial reveals Lixisenatide may reduce motor disability in Parkinson’s patients