U.S. can reduce healthcare expenditures with cost-cutting tools

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The United States could cut its per capita health care spending by double-digit percentages if it took full advantage of the cost-cutting tools now available, according to an article in the Winter 2010 Issues in Science and Technology.

Unfortunately, say authors Arnold Milstein and Helen Darling, neither the House nor the Senate health care bills come close to doing this. Milstein and Darling were participants in the Institute of Medicine's (IOM's) Roundtable on Evidence-Based Medicine.

"The IOM's series of roundtables provided ample evidence that the biggest barrier to progress is not lack of effective waste-trimming tools," the authors write. "Rather, it is the vulnerability of elected officials to accusations of impairing a service that is both consciously and unconsciously equated with protection from death and suffering. We can and must navigate through this political minefield so that we can accelerate efforts to produce better U.S. health care at a lower cost."

Also in the Winter 2010 Issues:

Perennial Grains: Food Security for the Future. Authors Jerry Glover of the Land Institute and John Reganold of Washington State University write that developing perennial versions of our major grain crops would address many of the environmental limitations of annuals while helping to feed an increasingly hungry planet.

Calming Our Nuclear Jitters. Ohio State University's John Mueller writes that an exaggerated fear of nuclear weapons has led to many wrongheaded policy decisions. "Nuclear weapons," he argues, "have had at best a quite limited effect on history, have been a substantial waste of money and effort, do not seem to have been terribly appealing to most states that do not have them, are out of reach for terrorists, and are unlikely to materially shape much of our future."

Changing Climate, More Damaging Weather. By failing to account for the effects of climate change, long-term projections of extreme weather are providing dangerously inaccurate guidance write Robert Repetto of the UN Foundation and Robert Easton of the University of Colorado at Boulder.

The Winter 2010 Issues also features an article on how academic research could be better used in setting homeland security policies.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Aster DM Healthcare reveals top foods to combat PCOS symptoms