No increase in risk of glioma or meningioma with use of mobile phones: INTERPHONE project

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The International Journal of Epidemiology today published a combined data analysis from a multi national population-based case-control study of glioma and meningioma, the most common types of brain tumour. This is the first in a series of combined data analyses of head and neck tumours published as part of the internationally coordinated INTERPHONE project.

The authors reported the following conclusion:

Overall, no increase in risk of glioma or meningioma was observed with use of mobile phones. There were suggestions of an increased risk of glioma at the highest exposure levels, but biases and error prevent a causal interpretation. The possible effects of long-term heavy use of mobile phones require further investigation.

In the press release accompanying the release of the paper, Dr Christopher Wild, Director of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) said: "An increased risk of brain cancer is not established from the data from Interphone. However, observations at the highest level of cumulative call time and the changing patterns of mobile phone use since the period studied by Interphone, particularly in young people, mean that further investigation of mobile phone use and brain cancer risk is merited."

Commenting on the study, Michael Milligan, Secretary General of the Mobile Manufacturers Forum said "The INTERPHONE project is the biggest study of its kind ever undertaken in this field and provides significant further reassurance about the safety of mobile phones. The overall analysis is consistent with previous studies and the significant body of research, reporting no increased health risk from using mobile phones."

He continued "The absence of increased health risks include long term mobile phone use for more than 10 years. The authors make it clear that the data was insufficient for a clear interpretation of possible risk from self-reported heavy use due to a number of possible errors or biases. For example, the paper notes that there is evidence that people diagnosed with a brain tumour over-reported their past mobile phone use and that 'recall bias-like this may be more likely if subjects perceive that mobile phone use is associated with brain tumours, as has been widely speculated in the media."

"Mobile phone users can take comfort in the fact that there is already a substantial body of scientific evidence on the long-tem use of mobile phones through whole-of-life animal studies, which have found no link between long-term exposure to radiofrequency and health impacts," added Mr Milligan.

The INTERPHONE results now need to be considered by independent health authorities, such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and other expert groups to assess their significance, if any, to people's health.

Mr Milligan added "The mobile industry supports the need for ongoing research. In fact, a number of longer-term studies are already underway such as the COSMOS study, which will follow the health of 250,000 European mobile users for 20-30 years, and several studies are now looking at children and teenagers, including the international MOBI-kids and CEFALO studies and the Australian MoRPhEUS project."

Although INTERPHONE is a large and important study, it must be viewed in context as only one of many studies that will be used in the overall cancer-risk assessment to be undertaken by IARC in 2011.

The mobile phone industry takes all questions regarding the safety of mobile phones seriously and has a strong commitment to supporting ongoing scientific research such as the way it supported the INTERPHONE project.

Source:

Mobile Manufacturers Forum

Comments

  1. Jan Jan Netherlands says:

    Simply not true. Check the table of Appendix 2 of the Interphone publication (data correction for bias). Then the results make sense and extrapolation is in line with more recent research (like the Chinese). Moreover IARC (WHO) has concluded the high frequency radiation of gsm etc. is possibly carcinogenic. This implicates that WHO does not exclude the possibility of damage to DNA by non-ionising radiation and damage by non-thermal effects of high frequency radiation (these effects are already documented by a.o. the Jülich Institute and in RF Review 2009/16 by ICNIRP). Damage to DNA does not only cause cancer, also other medical problems. Non-thermal effects also can cause negative medical situations. That is the truth, contrary to what the mobile phones industry says.  

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Breakthrough brain stimulator could revolutionize treatment for neurological disorders