No evidence for cancer risk with growth hormone therapy

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

By Eleanor McDermid, Senior medwireNews Reporter

There is no evidence that growth hormone (GH) therapy increases the likelihood of neoplasms in children with no additional risk factors, says the Pediatric Endocrine Society Drug and Therapeutics Committee.

This is despite “plausible molecular mechanisms and epidemiological evidence associating increased IGF-I [insulin-like growth factor-1] levels with the development of cancer”, says the team led by Sripriya Raman (University of Missouri, Kansas City, USA).

In their systematic review, Raman and colleagues identified a total of 10 clinical studies addressing cancer risk in people treated with GH as children. Six of these were large post-marketing or cohort studies, and none produced evidence of increased cancer risk at the time of treatment. There was also no consistent evidence of increased risk in adults who had received GH therapy during childhood.

However, there were no data addressing neoplasm risk in GH-treated children with other factors predisposing them to malignancy.

“In the absence of such evidence, clinicians should consider whether raising IGF-I levels might constitute an additional risk for neoplasia in patients predisposed to tumor development”, advises the team in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.

If children with increased predisposition to cancer undergo GH therapy, they should be regularly screened for cancers and their IGF-1 levels maintained within an age-appropriate range, suggest Raman et al.

The research, including the US Childhood Cancer Survivor Study, also suggests GH therapy does not increase the risk of cancer recurrence. However, it did find that treatment may double the risk of new neoplasms in paediatric cancer survivors, who already have a significantly increased risk of new cancers. But other studies did not find an increased risk of new primary tumours in GH-treated cancer survivors.

The team therefore says that paediatric cancer survivors without signs of active cancer may undergo GH treatment “without concern” of provoking recurrence, but advises: “Patients and caregivers should be informed that there may be an increase in the risk overall for subsequent primary neoplasms.”

medwireNews is an independent medical news service provided by Springer Healthcare Limited. © Springer Healthcare Ltd; 2015

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Ketone supplement boosts efficacy of prostate cancer immunotherapy