Early aspirin benefits after minor stroke 'underestimated'

By Eleanor McDermid

A meta-analysis of individual patient data has thrown light on the benefits of aspirin for secondary prevention in patients with ischaemic stroke.

The findings, published in The Lancet, show that the effectiveness of aspirin is limited to patients with mild or moderate stroke, but that the benefits for these patients are large, most particularly within the first 2 weeks after stroke.

Across 15,778 patients in 12 randomised trials, those who took aspirin versus placebo after a stroke had a 53% reduction in the risk of recurrent stroke within 12 weeks, with a larger effect during the first 6 weeks than the second 6 weeks, at 58% and 40%, respectively.

Besides being less likely to have a recurrent stroke, patients taking aspirin also had less severe strokes when they did occur, report Peter Rothwell (University of Oxford, UK) and co-authors.

Aspirin conferred risk reductions of 71% for disabling or fatal ischaemic stroke and 64% for fatal stroke during the first 6 weeks. It also conferred a 79% reduced risk of myocardial infarction. These benefits remained evident up to 12 weeks of follow-up, with the largest benefits observed within the first 2 weeks.

During the first 2 weeks, the largest risk reductions were seen for disabling or fatal stroke among patients with an initial transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke, with a 93% risk reduction compared with a 64% reduction for all patients during the same time period.

Just three trials randomised their 40,531 participants within 48 hours of the initial stroke. Among these patients, there was a clear effect of initial stroke severity; aspirin roughly halved recurrent stroke risk among patients with mild or moderate stroke, but had no effect for those with severe stroke.

Patients' risk of having a recurrent stroke fell over time, regardless of treatment, but the benefits of aspirin also declined, with no effect seen after 12 weeks. However, patients also given dipyridamole (11,937 in eight trials) saw a benefit after this point, with dipyridamole providing risk reductions of 24% for any stroke and 56% for disabling or fatal stroke, despite having no effect over the first 12 weeks.

In an accompanying commentary, Graeme Hankey (The University of Western Australia, Perth) says the study results imply that the benefits of early aspirin may have been underestimated and its longer-term effects overestimated.

Not only that, but he suggests clinicians have "been unaware of the benefits of aspirin in reducing the severity of early recurrent ischaemic stroke, and underestimated the effect of dipyridamole in preventing long-term recurrent stroke".

He says the findings "have implications for clinical practice", in that they underline the importance of rapid assessment of patients with minor symptoms and prompt administration of aspirin. And from a public health perspective, he suggests that patients with transient symptoms may be encouraged to take aspirin while waiting for medical attention.

Licensed from medwireNews with permission from Springer Healthcare Ltd. ©Springer Healthcare Ltd. All rights reserved. Neither of these parties endorse or recommend any commercial products, services, or equipment.

Source:

Lancet 2016; Advance online publication

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News-Medical.Net.
Post a new comment
Post
You might also like... ×
Rutgers cardiologist recommends individualized treatment with aspirin for primary prevention of CVD