Healthcare cuts linked to spike in mortality in England and Wales?

Thought LeadersProf. M. McKee and Dr L. HiamLSHTM

An interview with Professor Martin McKee and Dr Lucinda Hiam, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, conducted by April Cashin-Garbutt, MA (Cantab)

By how much did the number of deaths increase in 2015 in England and Wales? How does this compare to other years?

Deaths in 2015 increased by 5.6% compared to 2014, with 28,231 more deaths recorded. This is the biggest percentage increase for over 50 years, and third biggest since WWII.

What were the four possible explanations for the January 2015 spike in mortality?

Historically, we know that any worsening in mortality trends can be a warning of problems ahead and so it should be taken seriously. In practice, there is only a finite number of possible explanations for this.

First, issues with the data, such as errors in recording or large population movements; second, a major event, such as war or natural disasters; third, an epidemic of disease, and finally, problems with the health or social care system.

How did you test these explanations?

Some explanations were easy to exclude: although the increase in the elderly population did play a small role, there were no fundamental problems with the data when we looked closely, and there was no natural disaster or large-scale environmental event.

Although there certainly was an increase in cases of influenza, the pattern seen did not fit either with the spike in January or the overall rise in 2015.

Finally, we looked at the health and, crucially, the social care system. We found that the NHS in England missed almost all targets for performance in January, suggesting the system could not cope with a surge in demand.

What were your main findings?

We were unable to say conclusively with the limited data available, itself a matter of concern as we are now two years on, but our findings did indicate an urgent need to investigate whether the rise in mortality could be linked to the financial pressure on health and social care.

Were you surprised by these findings?

Those working in health and social care are unlikely to be surprised at the possibility of increased deaths due to funding cuts. We have seen the negative impact of the relentless pressures on health and social care, coupled with wider pressures on the welfare system, including increases in food banks, previous research linking increased deaths among the elderly to cuts in pension credits and social care, increased suicide rates, and growing homelessness.

The possibility of a link to increasing mortality, especially in older people who depend on a functioning health and social care system, is therefore not inconsistent with this growing body of research.

What further research is needed to explore the possibility that cuts to health and social care were implicated in the excess deaths?

It is essential that detailed data on deaths, by cause, age and area of residence, be made available much faster than at present. However, we recognize the severe pressure that the Office of National Statistics is under following cuts to its budget.

What are the main challenges facing the NHS and healthcare in England and Wales?

Any healthcare system needs sufficient funding to succeed, and it is clear at the moment the NHS is not receiving adequate resources to meet the needs of the population. The UK spends far less on health care than many similar countries.

The greatest challenge by far is, however, the threat of Brexit, with recruitment of EU health workers drying up, many existing workers leaving, the possibility that several hundred thousand British pensioners may have to return from elsewhere in the EU given that the government has not yet done anything to ensure their continued access to health care, the threat to access to medicines arising from the departure of the European Medicines Agency from London, inability to source medical isotopes following our departure from EURATOM, and the severe consequences for the British economy identified by the Office for Budget Responsibility.

What needs to be done to help tackle these challenges?

Given the government’s commitment to continued austerity and to Brexit, it is very difficult to say.

What do you think the future holds for healthcare and mortality in England and Wales?

Very difficult to say, but there are certainly considerable grounds for concern. One possibility is that we see mortality crises, such as that in January 2015, with ever greater frequency.

We can also look to other countries, and while all are to some extent different, the worsening death rate among poorly educated white Americans is also a matter of great concern, as was the increasing death rate among working age men in the last years of the USSR. All may offer lessons.

Where can readers find more information?

Both papers are available online at the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine website, along with commentary and debate. The raw data are publicly available online at the Official for National Statistics website, and NHS England.

About Professor Martin McKee, CBE MD DSc MSc FRCP(Lond) FRCP (Edin) FRCPI FFPH FMedSci

Martin McKee qualified in medicine in Belfast, Northern Ireland, with subsequent training in internal medicine and public health. He is Professor of European Public Health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine where he founded the European Centre on Health of Societies in Transition (ECOHOST), a WHO Collaborating Centre. He is also research director of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies and Past President of the European Public Health Association.

He has published over 970 academic papers and 44 books and his contributions to European health policy have been recognised by, among others, election to the UK Academy of Medical Sciences and the US National Academy of Medicine, by the award of honorary doctorates from Hungary, The Netherlands, and Sweden and visiting professorships at universities in Europe and Asia, the 2003 Andrija Stampar medal for contributions to European public health, in 2014 the Alwyn Smith Prize for outstanding contributions to the health of the population, and in 2015 the Donabedian International Award for contributions to quality of care.

In 2005 was made a Commander of the Order of the British Empire (CBE). He has an active following on Twitter as @martinmckee

About Dr Lucinda Hiam

Dr Lucinda Hiam is a postgraduate student at London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, and NHS GP.

April Cashin-Garbutt

Written by

April Cashin-Garbutt

April graduated with a first-class honours degree in Natural Sciences from Pembroke College, University of Cambridge. During her time as Editor-in-Chief, News-Medical (2012-2017), she kickstarted the content production process and helped to grow the website readership to over 60 million visitors per year. Through interviewing global thought leaders in medicine and life sciences, including Nobel laureates, April developed a passion for neuroscience and now works at the Sainsbury Wellcome Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, located within UCL.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. (2018, August 23). Healthcare cuts linked to spike in mortality in England and Wales?. News-Medical. Retrieved on December 09, 2021 from

  • MLA

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. "Healthcare cuts linked to spike in mortality in England and Wales?". News-Medical. 09 December 2021. <>.

  • Chicago

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. "Healthcare cuts linked to spike in mortality in England and Wales?". News-Medical. (accessed December 09, 2021).

  • Harvard

    Cashin-Garbutt, April. 2018. Healthcare cuts linked to spike in mortality in England and Wales?. News-Medical, viewed 09 December 2021,


  1. Cathy Farrell Cathy Farrell United States says:

    Part of the problem in the health industry is insurance.  Send a person home too soon after surgery, that person can get hurt.  Why did they send that person home too soon - insurance.  The cost of medication is seriously rising, and people will get to the point they can't afford their medication.  Some of these medicines are necessary to continue living.  But the pharmaceutical companies just don't care.  What is the problem - greed.  What happens when we lose Incentives to improve health.  Ever since insurance started paying for doctor visits, dental visits, vision, etc., the cost of those services rose tremendously.  No one feels guilty about charging too much. The insurance company is paying for it.  They will say the insurance company doesn't give them enough to make a profit.  I disagree.  I say greed is running the medical industry.  Doctors don't always do what is best for the patient.  They are doing what is best for the pharmaceutical companies.  The drug companies are making a fortune at our expense.  I keep hearing more and more serious medical problems with people.  Everyone has this and that condition not just a few.  It was rare when we heard about a certain person who had something serious such as cancer. Now it is rare if you don't know many people who have cancer or macular degeneration or autism and on and on.  Greed drives us instead of good common sense and caring about the welfare of others.  To tell you the truth people who run things don't really care if people die from these problems.  They think there are too many of us are on earth.  They don't really care if people get hurt in the process while they are making money at what they are doing.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
You might also like... ×
Impact of infection control measures and vaccines in protecting healthcare workers from COVID-19