Are sunscreens giving us the protection we need?

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The harmful effects of the sun's ultraviolet (UV) rays are well publicised and the risk of developing skin cancer has scared many people into using a sunscreen product to protect their skin when exposed to the sun. However, a recent test of the performance of a range of marketed sun protection products revealed that many of them fail to provide adequate protection against UV rays.

Credit: Armari36/Shutterstock.com

UV radiation is emitted by the sun and, having wavelengths shorter than visible light, is invisible to the naked eye. Although there are three classes of UV light, UVA, UVB and UVC, only UVA and UVB reach earth. Both UVA and UVB cause damage to the skin; UVA penetrates deep into the skin causing wrinkling and other signs of aging whereas UVB only reaches superficial layers of the skin resulting in sunburn. UV radiation also suppresses the immune system, reducing the body's ability to fight against the development of cancerous cells and other diseases.

The American Academy of Dermatology recommends everyone use sunscreen daily as we are exposed to damaging UV rays even on cloudy days. They advise using a product with a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) of 30 or higher that protects against UVA and UVB rays, and reapplying it regularly. The SPF is a measure of the product's ability to screen or block out UV rays. An SPF rating of 30 indicates that a thirtieth of the UV rays reach the skin through the sunscreen.

Every year Consumer Reports, the world’s largest independent, non-profit consumer organization, tests 58 sunscreen products for the levels of UVA and UVB protection they offer. This year, they reported that 20 of the sunscreens tested provided less than half the sun protection claimed on their label. Some products provided good protection despite it not being as high as the manufacturer's claim. Importantly, none of the ‘natural’ or mineral active ingredients, such as zinc oxide, provided adequate UVA and UVB protection.

Trisha Calvo, ‎Deputy Content Editor, Health and Nutrition at Consumer Reports, commented “For the fifth year in a row, many sunscreens failed to provide an adequate level of protection in our tests. When consumers wear sunscreen, they should feel confident that they’re well-defended against sunburn, skin cancer, and skin aging, and that they’re actually getting the level of protection promised on the label.”

The researchers recommended that, to ensure their safety, consumers only buy sunscreen products containing chemical active ingredients, such as avobenzone, that have an SPF of at least 40.

Kate Bass

Written by

Kate Bass

Kate graduated from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne with a biochemistry B.Sc. degree. She also has a natural flair for writing and enthusiasm for scientific communication, which made medical writing an obvious career choice. In her spare time, Kate enjoys walking in the hills with friends and travelling to learn more about different cultures around the world.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Bass, Kate. (2019, June 20). Are sunscreens giving us the protection we need?. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 22, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20170519/Are-sunscreens-giving-us-the-protection-we-need.aspx.

  • MLA

    Bass, Kate. "Are sunscreens giving us the protection we need?". News-Medical. 22 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20170519/Are-sunscreens-giving-us-the-protection-we-need.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Bass, Kate. "Are sunscreens giving us the protection we need?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20170519/Are-sunscreens-giving-us-the-protection-we-need.aspx. (accessed April 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Bass, Kate. 2019. Are sunscreens giving us the protection we need?. News-Medical, viewed 22 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20170519/Are-sunscreens-giving-us-the-protection-we-need.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New research pinpoints key pathways in prostate cancer's vulnerability to ferroptosis