Vaping wrecks immune cell function, increases infection risk

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A new study published in the Journal Cell Physiology shows that e-cigarettes have toxic effects on neutrophils function, making them a threat to human health by increasing the likelihood of infection with Gram-negative bacteria. E-cigarettes are in wide use today, among 7% to 12% of adults and up to 37% of teenagers/new adults. While touted as a safer alternative to conventional smoking, evidence shows that they can be extremely harmful and in fact, lethal, as the recent spate of vaping-linked deaths in America shows.

Neutrophils and immunity

Neutrophils are the most abundant component of white cells in blood at 50% to 70%, and are part of the body’s innate immune response, the first defense against microbial intruders. They are thus crucial to controlling infections and eliminating the organisms from the body. When they are exposed to bacterial antigens, they move towards the site, following the trace rather like a bloodhound smelling out the target. This is called chemotaxis - attraction towards bacterial chemicals.

Neutrophil in blood, a white blood cell, 3D illustratio Credit: Kateryna Kon / SHutterstock
Neutrophil in blood, a white blood cell, 3D illustratio Credit: Kateryna Kon / Shutterstock

Pseudomonas is a Gram-negative organism known for its ability to cause blood infection, pneumonia, urinary infections and other infections in the abdomen. Prior research showed that vapor from e-cigarettes led to reduced killing of these organisms by neutrophils isolated from healthy volunteers.

Vaping – not a safe alternative

E-cigarettes have become a topic of hot controversy, with some people arguing their safety vis-à-vis conventional cigarettes, and others pointing out the almost complete lack of knowledge regarding the safety of inhaled chemicals in e-cigarette smoke, and their physiological effects. Evidence is mounting that shows that E-cigarettes may harm the immune system in the host, though all the mechanisms have not been fully elucidated so far. Their use has been linked to acute eosinophilic pneumonia, lipoid pneumonia, hypersensitivity, asthma, bronchitis, reduced mucociliary clearance of the airways, severe acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome – severely affecting their image as safe and trendy alternatives to smoking.

The study and its findings

The researchers used commercial vaping liquids and a commonly used vaping device to expose batches of neutrophils in culture to fresh puffs of e-cigarette vapor. They also injected Pseudomonas into healthy mice, exposed them to e-cigarette smoke over the long term and examined neutrophil migration as well as bacterial load.

Neutrophils in culture

The researchers found a 4-fold reduction in chemotaxis in human neutrophils exposed to e-cigarette vapor. Normally, their attraction to Gram-negative bacteria occurs in response to the cell wall component f-Met-Leu-Phe.

The neutrophils also showed increased membrane rigidity and less polarization mediated by F-actin, a cytoskeletal molecule, which forms the leading edge of the moving cell. Both these changes affect the cell’s ability to move freely.

They were also partially disarmed by e-cigarette smoke, which reduced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production within the immune cells by 48%. ROS are at the heart of neutrophil attack by what biologists call the neutrophil extracellular trap (NET). These fascinating antibacterial weapons are structures created from DNA strands coated with sticky proteins or peptides that fight microbes.

The researchers assessed NET production quantitatively, and found that when exposed to e-cigarette vapor, it went down by 3.5 times, mainly, it appears in response to propylene glycol in the vaping liquid. These effects appear to be independent of nicotine since it is seen in neutrophils exposed to pure propylene glycol vapor and to a mixture of propylene glycol and glycerine as well as to a similar mixture also containing nicotine. Alternative mechanisms of NET production remain intact, however.

Still another toxic effect was the lower rate of phagocytosis in neutrophils, the process by which these immune cells engulf bacterial particles. This showed a striking reduction to just over half the original value. Previous studies have shown that macrophages are also unable to phagocytose bacteria effectively.

Neutrophils in infected mice

The researchers also examined how neutrophils behaved in an animal model, with mice exposed long-term (for one hour each day, over one month) to e-cigarette smoke and infection with Gram-negative bacteria. They found that fewer neutrophils in these animals migrated into body spaces that contained infectious organisms, and there was therefore a higher concentration of the bacterium Pseudomonas. Their RNA sequencing studies on lung tissue from these animals also show that endothelial cells may be impacted by the e-cigarette vapor, such that they have a lower production of proteins that stimulate the passage of leukocytes out of the blood vessel into the infected site.


The study strongly suggests that e-cigarette use dampens the immune response very significantly, and predisposes users to slow weak immune defenses against invasive bacterial infections. It adds to the proof that like tobacco smoking and BPA, e-cigarette vapor plays a role in altering host defenses via its action on neutrophils. People who vape may be putting themselves at risk of increased numbers of harmful bacteria in their bodies, as well as impaired neutrophil immunity to move into infected sites and kill the bacteria.  The outcome may be increased vulnerability to infections as well as more serious infection.

Flavoring chemicals in vaping liquids may have an even stronger effect. Moreover, while acute exposure by neutrophils directly to this vapor results in the inability to fight infection effectively, systemic exposure through the blood could promote inflammation that increases NET production.

Journal reference:

E-cigarette use increases susceptibility to bacterial infection by impairment of human 1 neutrophil chemotaxis, phagocytosis and NET formation. Ross Corridena, Alexander Moshensky, Christine M. Bojanowski, Angela Meier, Jason Chiena, Ryan K. Nelson, and Laura E. Crotty Alexander. American Journal of Physiology – Cell, 2019. ( on November 14, 2019.

Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.


Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2019, November 17). Vaping wrecks immune cell function, increases infection risk. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 22, 2024 from

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "Vaping wrecks immune cell function, increases infection risk". News-Medical. 22 April 2024. <>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "Vaping wrecks immune cell function, increases infection risk". News-Medical. (accessed April 22, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2019. Vaping wrecks immune cell function, increases infection risk. News-Medical, viewed 22 April 2024,


  1. Tristan Cox Tristan Cox Australia says:

    Accept all of the above, but where is the comparison to normal cigarettes? This article inadequately targets vaping when the issue is perhaps more aptly described as parallel to the danger so regualr smoking; e.g.

  2. Raquel scherr Raquel scherr United States says:

    Is the same true for vaping of cannabis oils?

  3. Alex Dumaa Alex Dumaa United States says:

    If you stop vaping, how long does it take for all of this to reverse for someone vaping 6 months

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Discovery of new vascular cell type may pave way for novel strategies to treat cardiovascular diseases