Study examines mRNA COVID-19 vaccine’s effectiveness across age and gender

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A team of scientists from Estonia has recently characterized the anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antibody response induced by an mRNA-based coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine in relation to age, sex, and side-effects.

The findings reveal that although the two-dose vaccine regimen initially induces robust antibody response in all age groups, older male individuals are particularly associated with a gradual decline in vaccine-induced immunity six weeks after the second vaccine dose. The study is currently available on the medRxiv* preprint server.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Background

After successful development and clinical validation, several COVID-19 vaccines are currently rolling out worldwide to curb the uprising trajectory of the pandemic. Among all vaccine types, so far, mRNA-based vaccines have shown the highest efficacy in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and reducing mortality. For instance, in the phase 3 clinical trial, the two-dose regimen of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) has shown an acceptable safety level and 95% efficacy against COVID-19.

However, studies investigating the impacts of age, sex, ethnicity, and other demographic factors on vaccine efficacy have shown that older individuals are particularly more likely to exhibit a weaker immunity in response to COVID-19 vaccination.

In the current study, the scientists have explored the dynamics of IgG-specific anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody response after the first and second doses of Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b2. They have also investigated whether age, sex, and vaccine-related side-effects can influence the vaccine efficacy.

Study design

The study was conducted on 118 healthy volunteers (age range: 21 – 68 years) who received two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine. The immune responses of the volunteers were examined up to 6 weeks following the second vaccine dose. Specifically, the post-vaccination time points for monitoring immune response were three weeks after the first dose, just before the second dose, one week after the second dose, and six weeks after the second dose. The post-vaccination immune responses were compared with the baseline immune response (before the first vaccine dose).    

The serum samples collected from the volunteers were analyzed for IgG-specific antibodies against the spike receptor-binding domain (RBD) of SARS-CoV-2.

Important observations

By estimating serum antibody titers, the scientists observed that compared to the baseline values, the anti-spike RBD antibody levels increased three weeks after the first vaccine dose. The antibody levels peaked at one week after the second dose, followed by a gradual decline. Specifically, they observed a 45% reduction in antibody level between one and six weeks after the second dose. The majority of volunteers showed a similar trend of declining antibody levels. However, only 4% of volunteers exhibited increased antibody levels at six weeks after the second dose.

Interestingly, they observed that the IgG-specific anti-spike RBD antibody levels in COVID-19 recovered patients were significantly lower than observed in volunteers who received the second vaccine dose. However, volunteers immunized with only the first dose showed relatively lower antibody levels than COVID-19 recovered patients.

Factors influencing vaccine response

The scientists identified age as a major contributing factor for vaccine efficacy, which showed a negative correlation with antibody response at all time points tested. The volunteers aged less than 40 years showed significantly higher antibody levels at all tested time points compared to those above 40 years.

Furthermore, they observed that the negative correlation between age and vaccine-induced immune response was significantly more prominent in male volunteers than female volunteers.

Vaccine-related side-effects

About 93% of volunteers reported having mild to moderate side-effects, including swelling/pain at the injection site, fatigue, malaise, headache, chills, fever, or myalgia. However, about 22% of volunteers reported having long-lasting side-effects that resulted in workplace absenteeism and impaired daily life activities.

Interestingly, some of the side-effects, including fever, headache, fatigue, malaise, chills, and nausea, showed a strong positive correlation with vaccine-related immune responses. This correlation was significantly more prominent among male volunteers than female volunteers. Regarding age variation, older volunteers showed relatively fewer adverse side-effects than younger volunteers.

Study significance

The study findings reveal a robust antibody response among healthy volunteers immunized with Pfizer/BioNTech mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine. This observation further strengthens the effectiveness of mRNA-based vaccines in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic.

Furthermore, the study indicates that the vaccine is relatively less effective in older males than older females. However, older people are less susceptible to have vaccine-related side-effects than younger people.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Apr 8 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta

Written by

Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta

Dr. Sanchari Sinha Dutta is a science communicator who believes in spreading the power of science in every corner of the world. She has a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree and a Master's of Science (M.Sc.) in biology and human physiology. Following her Master's degree, Sanchari went on to study a Ph.D. in human physiology. She has authored more than 10 original research articles, all of which have been published in world renowned international journals.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. (2023, April 08). Study examines mRNA COVID-19 vaccine’s effectiveness across age and gender. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 29, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210428/Study-examines-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccinee28099s-effectiveness-across-age-and-gender.aspx.

  • MLA

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. "Study examines mRNA COVID-19 vaccine’s effectiveness across age and gender". News-Medical. 29 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210428/Study-examines-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccinee28099s-effectiveness-across-age-and-gender.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. "Study examines mRNA COVID-19 vaccine’s effectiveness across age and gender". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210428/Study-examines-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccinee28099s-effectiveness-across-age-and-gender.aspx. (accessed April 29, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Dutta, Sanchari Sinha Dutta. 2023. Study examines mRNA COVID-19 vaccine’s effectiveness across age and gender. News-Medical, viewed 29 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210428/Study-examines-mRNA-COVID-19-vaccinee28099s-effectiveness-across-age-and-gender.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Did California's pediatric COVID-19 vaccination program reduce reported cases and hospitalizations?