What is the long-term vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection?

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Massive vaccination programs throughout the world have led to significant protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe diseases. However, there has been an increase in breakthrough infections during late 2021 and early 2022 among vaccinated individuals due to the replacement of the Delta variant with the Omicron variant.

Therefore, the waning of protection for different vaccines and the number of doses that are received must be urgently estimated. Although previous studies have quantified vaccine effectiveness (VE) against symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection, the estimates have been arbitrating.

Study: Waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity: A systematic review and secondary data analysis. Image Credit: BaLL LunLa/Shutterstock
Study: Waning of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-induced immunity: A systematic review and secondary data analysis. Image Credit: BaLL LunLa/Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

A new study posted to the pre-print server medRxiv* aimed to estimate the waning of vaccine protection by performing a systematic literature review of studies that reported VE at different times post-vaccination.

About the study

The study involved screening abstracts and titles of preprints and peer-reviewed journals in English for the identification of manuscripts on VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection (including both symptomatic and asymptomatic infection) as well as a symptomatic disease until 21st June 2022. Thereafter, the full texts of the manuscripts were scrutinized according to the current study’s eligibility criteria that included estimation of VE after the primary vaccination dose (comprising the first two doses) as well as a booster dose, comparison of the risk of infection between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals, VE estimation for two defined time intervals, information on circulating variants during the assessment of VE, and estimation of VE for all age-groups that are eligible for vaccination.

Studies that measured VE during the first 14 days of administration of the vaccine and those comprising less than 20 infections in a vaccinated group were excluded from the analysis.

Study findings

The results indicated that out of the 39 articles that reported evidence of VE only ten articles matched the eligibility criteria and provided VE estimation for the mRNA-1273, BNT162b2, and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines against Alpha, Omicron, or Delta variants. The VE 14 days post-second dose of mRNA-1273 and BNT162b2 was observed to be 94.7% and 92.45%, respectively against the Delta (symptomatic and asymptomatic) variant. Although a similar VE for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 was observed in Quebec, the VE was found to be lower as compared to the other two vaccines after the second dose as well as 3 months after vaccination in British Columbia and the UK.

No VE difference against Delta was observed at 9 months post-vaccination for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and mRNA-1273. However, a decline in VE was observed in the case of BNT162b2 against both Delta and Omicron infections. The VE against Omicron infection for three doses of BNT162b2 was observed to be 82.4%, 31.5%, and 19.0%, respectively at 14 days, at 6, and 9 months post administration of the last vaccine dose.

The results also reported the VE 14 days post administration of the second dose for BNT162b2, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and mRNA-1273 to be 93.6%, 76.2%, and 96.2%, respectively against symptomatic Delta infections. The corresponding VE against symptomatic Omicron infection was observed to be 83.6%, 56.1%, and 76.3% for mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and BNT162b2, respectively.

The VE was observed to decline to 40.2%, 64.4%, and 74.1% for ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, BNT162b2, and mRNA-1273, respectively, at 6 months post-second dose against symptomatic Delta infections. The VE against symptomatic Omicron infection at 6 months post the second dose was observed to be 12.0%, 7.5%, and 8.3% for mRNA-1273, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, and BNT162b2, respectively. The VE against symptomatic Omicron infection at 9 months post-vaccination was observed to be below 5 % for all the vaccines. Moreover, the VE for booster dose against symptomatic Omicron infection was observed to be between 11.7% and 22.2%.

Therefore, the current study demonstrated that Omicron infection and symptomatic disease were associated with significant immune escape following two doses of vaccination. However, booster doses could restore vaccine protection to levels similar to those observed soon after the second dose. They could also reduce the speed of waning. However, the continuous emergence of new Omicron sub-lineages or other potential future variants of SARS-CoV-2 requires further vaccination efforts to prevent the resurgence of COVID-19 patients.

Limitations

The study has certain limitations. First, the sample size of the study was quite small. Second, the duration of the follow-up period for the effectiveness of booster doses was limited. Third, preferential testing of symptomatic individuals may have led to bias. Fourth, different study designs might have impacted original estimates of vaccine effectiveness. Finally, recent studies indicate that hybrid and natural immunity are more durable as compared to vaccine-induced immunity.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 13 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Suchandrima Bhowmik

Written by

Suchandrima Bhowmik

Suchandrima has a Bachelor of Science (B.Sc.) degree in Microbiology and a Master of Science (M.Sc.) degree in Microbiology from the University of Calcutta, India. The study of health and diseases was always very important to her. In addition to Microbiology, she also gained extensive knowledge in Biochemistry, Immunology, Medical Microbiology, Metabolism, and Biotechnology as part of her master's degree.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Bhowmik, Suchandrima. (2023, May 13). What is the long-term vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection?. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 24, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220708/What-is-the-long-term-vaccine-effectiveness-against-SARS-CoV-2-infection.aspx.

  • MLA

    Bhowmik, Suchandrima. "What is the long-term vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection?". News-Medical. 24 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220708/What-is-the-long-term-vaccine-effectiveness-against-SARS-CoV-2-infection.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Bhowmik, Suchandrima. "What is the long-term vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection?". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220708/What-is-the-long-term-vaccine-effectiveness-against-SARS-CoV-2-infection.aspx. (accessed April 24, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Bhowmik, Suchandrima. 2023. What is the long-term vaccine effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2 infection?. News-Medical, viewed 24 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220708/What-is-the-long-term-vaccine-effectiveness-against-SARS-CoV-2-infection.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Oregon study finds no clear link between mRNA vaccines and sudden cardiac deaths in young people