Skin barrier monitoring predicts necrosis after skin flap surgery

Random-pattern skin flaps (RPSFs) receive blood mainly from small subcutaneous vessels rather than a defined axial vessel, leaving them vulnerable to ischemia and hypoxia after surgery. Current clinical assessments often depend on flap color, swelling, texture, vascular perfusion, or biopsy, which may be subjective, delayed, or invasive. Skin barrier function offers another window into tissue status because transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and stratum corneum hydration (SCH) reflect barrier integrity and moisture balance. Due to these challenges, further research is needed to develop objective, non-invasive, and mechanism-based methods for predicting skin flap necrosis before visible damage occurs.

In a study published (DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkag016) on 27 February 2026 in Burns & Trauma, researchers from Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Wenzhou Medical University, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, and North Sichuan Medical College reported that skin barrier monitoring could predict RPSF necrosis and reveal the immune mechanism behind this early deterioration.

The team combined mouse RPSF models, clinical samples, prospective validation, gene ontology (GO) analysis, immunohistochemistry (IHC), immunofluorescence (IF), western blotting (WB), and cell experiments. In mice, visible necrosis appeared only after several days, but relative transepidermal water loss (RT), relative stratum corneum hydration (RS), and relative humidity (RH) changed earlier, suggesting that barrier failure precedes overt tissue death. Mechanistic experiments showed that ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death, damaged keratinocytes and intensified M1 macrophage polarization. At the same time, Tregs appeared to act as a protective counterweight. Ubiquitin-specific protease 4 (USP4) stabilized tumor necrosis factor alpha-induced protein 2 (TNFAIP2) through deubiquitination, promoting C-C motif chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2)/C-C chemokine receptor 2 (CCR2)-mediated Treg recruitment. This "M1 macrophages-Tregs axis" helped restrain ferroptosis and inflammation. In clinical analysis, RT greater than 3.5 and RS lower than −2.5 showed strong predictive value for later necrosis.

The authors said the study changes how flap prognosis can be viewed after surgery. Rather than waiting for color changes, swelling, or clear necrosis, clinicians may be able to read the skin barrier as an earlier biological warning. They said the work also explains why that warning appears: ischemic stress activates ferroptosis and inflammatory macrophages, while the USP4-TNFAIP2 pathway helps recruit Tregs to limit damage. This makes barrier monitoring both a practical bedside signal and a window into the immune biology of flap survival.

The findings could support earlier and more precise postoperative decision-making, especially within the first three days after RPSF surgery, when intervention may still reduce tissue loss. A portable skin barrier monitoring approach may help clinicians identify vulnerable flaps, guide timely treatment, and reduce reliance on invasive or subjective assessment. The study also highlights the USP4-TNFAIP2-CCL2/CCR2 pathway as a possible target for future therapies aimed at strengthening protective immune feedback and limiting ferroptosis-driven barrier damage. Larger multicenter studies, including other flap types and patients with comorbidities, will be important before broader clinical adoption.

Source:
Journal reference:

Zhang, X., et al. (2026) Innovative Research on Predicting Skin Flaps Necrosis through Quantification of the USP4/TNFAIP2 Regulated “M1 Macrophages-Tregs Axis” via Skin Barrier Monitoring Technology, Burns & Trauma. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkag016. https://academic.oup.com/burnstrauma/advance-article/doi/10.1093/burnst/tkag016/8500985

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
AI turns everyday smartphone use into passive heart-rate tracking