Accurate protein analysis with minimal sample volumes

The NanoDrop Ultra Microvolume UV-Vis spectrophotometers and fluorometers from Thermo Scientific deliver rapid, straightforward protein analysis.

Proteins can be easily quantified using only 1 to 2 µL sample volumes via a microvolume pedestal and several pre-programmed protein applications, all without the need for error-prone dilutions.

Reproducibility for bovine serum albumin (BSA) is generally a standard deviation of ±0.03 mg/mL for concentrations between 0.03 and 10 mg/mL. Above 10 mg/mL, reproducibility is commonly ±2% coefficient of variation (%CV).

NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers can quantify proteins accurately and reproducibly. These instruments accommodate a broad measurement range of 0.03 mg/mL to 820 mg/mL (BSA).

Method

The NanoDrop Ultra instrument’s protein specifications were assessed and verified against two reference instruments: a Thermo Scientific NanoDrop One Spectrophotometer and a cuvette-based Thermo Scientific Evolution One Plus Spectrophotometer.

A dilution series of BSA (Sigma Aldrich, A7284) was prepared to yield a concentration range of 0.75 mg/mL to 15 mg/mL. Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) was used as the diluent (samples 1 to 4).

A further dilution series of 70 mg/mL to 300 mg/mL was created using potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) (Thermo Scientific Chemicals, 424061000). This was used because its UV spectrum mimics that of purified proteins, exhibiting a peak at 280 nm (samples 5 to 7).

KHP was appropriate for this concentration range due to BSA’s tendency to become extremely viscous at high concentrations, introducing challenges to accurate pipetting. Measures of replicates of 10 2 µL samples were carried out, using both the NanoDrop Ultra and NanoDrop One spectrophotometers.

A low concentration range of 0.03 mg/mL to 1.5 mg/mL was tested before being compared against the Evolution One Plus reference instrument.

This involved measuring replicates of 10 2 µL samples on the NanoDrop Ultra instrument and triplicates of 2 mL on the Evolution One Plus instrument via a 1 cm quartz cuvette.

Samples on the NanoDrop instruments were measured using the Protein A280 application for each dilution series. “BSA” was selected as the sample type to ensure the correct E1% of 6.7 was applied for use in Beer’s Law.

Absorbance was measured using the Evolution One Plus instrument’s Fixed application with a 280 nm analysis wavelength, one-second integration time, and 1 nm bandwidth. Next, the standard deviation, average, and %CV were calculated for each sample.

Table 1. Average concentrations of serial dilutions of BSA (samples 1–4) and KHP (samples 5–7) measured on the NanoDrop One and the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers. Each sample was averaged from replicates of 10, and the standard deviation (mg/mL) and %CV are both reported. Source: Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

  NanoDrop One spectrophotometer NanoDrop Ultra Spectrophotometer
Sample name Concentration
(mg/mL)
Standard Deviation
(mg/mL)
%CV Concentration
(mg/mL)
Standard deviation
(mg/mL)
%CV
Sample 1 0.74 0.01 1.574 0.75 0.01 1.893
Sample 2 1.48 0.02 1.411 1.52 0.02 1.050
Sample 3 7.42 0.01 0.185 7.49 0.01 0.151
Sample 4 15.13 0.08 0.493 15.23 0.03 0.205
Sample 5 71.6 0.3 0.488 70.4 0.2 0.323
Sample 6 147.8 0.7 0.447 144.9 0.4 0.309
Sample 7 299.8 0.8 0.274 293 1 0.416

Table 2. Reported concentration for each replicate measurement from the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer. Provided at the bottom of the table are the average, standard deviation, and %CV for each sample. Source: Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Sample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Replicate 1 0.736 1.529 7.479 15.208 70.342 145.366 293.311
Replicate 2 0.753 1.521 7.498 15.210 70.326 144.473 294.268
Replicate 3 0.773 1.522 7.505 15.204 70.444 144.788 292.169
Replicate 4 0.754 1.511 7.483 15.208 70.169 144.702 293.911
Replicate 5 0.766 1.495 7.468 15.262 70.756 145.025 290.744
Replicate 6 0.761 1.498 7.494 15.192 70.433 144.483 291.915
Replicate 7 0.759 1.520 7.491 15.209 70.745 144.592 294.352
Replicate 8 0.725 1.493 7.500 15.277 70.138 145.575 292.672
Replicate 9 0.758 1.541 7.500 15.248 70.353 144.411 293.628
Replicate 10 0.748 1.523 7.491 15.267 70.104 145.516 291.687
Average (mg/mL) 0.75 1.52 7.49 15.23 70.4 144.9 293
Standard deviation (mg/mL) 0.01 0.02 0.01 0.03 0.2 0.4 1
%CV 1.893 1.050 0.151 0.205 0.323 0.309 0.416

Results

Table 1 provides the standard deviation, mean, and %CV for samples 1–7 of the BSA and KHP dilution series.

Table 2 shows each sample replicate measured on the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer.

Standard deviations were found to be well below the specified limit of 0.03 mg/mL for samples 1 to 3, with 0.016 mg/mL determined to be the highest amount of deviation.

Samples featuring concentrations greater than 10 mg/mL (samples 4 to 7) also exhibited %CV below the 2% limit, with the highest being 0.42%.

The linearity curve displayed in Figure 1 shows that the NanoDrop One and the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers show a strong correlation in sample concentrations, as evidenced by an R2 of 1.000.

Linearity comparison between the NanoDrop One spectrophotometer and the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer. The regression line (R2 = 1.000) indicates sample concentration measurements were well correlated

Figure 1. Linearity comparison between the NanoDrop One spectrophotometer and the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer. The regression line (R2 = 1.000) indicates sample concentration measurements were well correlated. Image Credit: Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Table 3. Average concentrations and standard deviations for each sample in the low concentration range (0.03 mg/mL to 1.5 mg/mL). The samples from the Evolution One Plus spectrophotometer were averaged from triplicates, while those from the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer were averaged from replicates of 10. Source: Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Evolution One Plus spectrophotometer NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer
Sample name Concentration
(mg/mL)
Standard deviation
(mg/mL)
Concentration
(mg/mL)
Standard deviation
(mg/mL)
Sample 1 1.565 0.000 1.56 0.01
Sample 2 1.180 0.001 1.1 0.02
Sample 3 0.766 0.000 0.770 0.007
Sample 4 0.143 0.000 0.14 0.01
Sample 5 0.026 0.000 0.031 0.008

The NanoDrop Ultra instrument’s measured low concentration range (0.03 mg/mL to 1.5 mg/mL) was compared with the concentrations measured on the Evolution One Plus instrument.

Table 3 lists each sample’s average and standard deviation. The highest standard deviation from the NanoDrop Ultra instrument was determined to be 0.02 mg/mL, below the specified limit of 0.03 mg/mL.

Figure 2 features a linearity curve comparing the two instruments. The regression line’s R2 (1.000) confirms excellent alignment between the concentrations reported by the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers and those reported by the Evolution One Plus.

Linearity comparison of the Evolution One Plus and NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers. The R2 value of the regression line (1.000) indicates excellent correlation between reported sample concentrations

Figure 2. Linearity comparison of the Evolution One Plus and NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometers. The R2 value of the regression line (1.000) indicates excellent correlation between reported sample concentrations. Image Credit: Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

Conclusions

The study presented here confirms that the NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer offers excellent linearity and reproducibility when used to determine purified protein concentrations.

The results provided by the NanoDrop Ultra instrument were compared against reference spectrophotometers, highlighting that these were well aligned, as evidenced by R2 values of 1.000 for the low- and full-range protein concentrations.

The NanoDrop Ultra spectrophotometer’s efficiency when quantifying protein samples is proven by its pre-programmed applications, rapid measurement time, and the absence of required dilutions.

Dilutions that are typical for cuvette-based spectrophotometers are rendered unnecessary by the instrument’s wide dynamic range of 0.03 mg/mL to 820 mg/mL for BSA proteins.

A NanoDrop Ultra instrument can be easily implemented into the protein quantification workflow, saving valuable resources and time in the laboratory.

About Thermo Fisher Scientific - UV-Vis Spectroscopy

UV-Vis Spectrometers overview

Scientists can count on our broad range of ultraviolet (UV) and visible (Vis) spectrophotometers to deliver reliable, accurate data. The Thermo Scientific SPECTRONIC 200, GENESYS, and Evolution product lines are designed to streamline measurements, providing consistent, high-quality results, time after time. Additionally, the innovative Thermo Scientific NanoDrop microvolume family of instruments has been helping scientists accelerate the pace of discovery for over 20 years. From classroom teaching to routine measurements to discovery of the next scientific breakthrough, our line of spectrophotometers is designed to fit into any modern laboratory.


Sponsored Content Policy: News-Medical.net publishes articles and related content that may be derived from sources where we have existing commercial relationships, provided such content adds value to the core editorial ethos of News-Medical.net, which is to educate and inform site visitors interested in medical research, science, medical devices and treatments.

Last updated: Sep 2, 2026 at 5:51 AM

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thermo Fisher Scientific – Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Solutions. (2026, September 02). Accurate protein analysis with minimal sample volumes. News-Medical. Retrieved on September 02, 2026 from https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20260902/Accurate-protein-analysis-with-minimal-sample-volumes.aspx.

  • MLA

    Thermo Fisher Scientific – Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Solutions. "Accurate protein analysis with minimal sample volumes". News-Medical. 02 September 2026. <https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20260902/Accurate-protein-analysis-with-minimal-sample-volumes.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Thermo Fisher Scientific – Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Solutions. "Accurate protein analysis with minimal sample volumes". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20260902/Accurate-protein-analysis-with-minimal-sample-volumes.aspx. (accessed September 02, 2026).

  • Harvard

    Thermo Fisher Scientific – Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Solutions. 2026. Accurate protein analysis with minimal sample volumes. News-Medical, viewed 02 September 2026, https://www.news-medical.net/whitepaper/20260902/Accurate-protein-analysis-with-minimal-sample-volumes.aspx.

Other White Papers by this Supplier

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.