Validated eC-SSRS solution available for prospective monitoring of suicidal ideation and behaviors

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

ERT (Nasdaq: ERES), a leading provider of centralized services to global pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies, announces a pioneering electronic self-rated version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) to facilitate compliance with regulatory requirements for prospective monitoring of suicidal ideation and behaviors. The validated eC-SSRS solution, developed in collaboration with the scale lead author, is a cost-effective method of prospectively monitoring for suicidality. It has been designed, in line with anticipated FDA requirements, to reliably and reproducibly assess suicidality in clinical trials; thereby, protecting patient safety while significantly reducing the burden on study sites.

In recent years, there has been increased focus on treatment-emergent suicidality and the development of a reliable assessment method for use in clinical trials to enhance effective patient-safety monitoring. The FDA is developing guidance on regulatory requirements for suicidality monitoring. In light of concerns regarding the burdens placed on investigators, ERT, in collaboration with the scale authors, the Center for Suicide Risk Assessment (CSRA) and Healthcare Technology Systems, developed the eC-SSRS.  

Kelly Posner, Director of the CSRA at Columbia University and primary author of the C-SSRS, comments: "The FDA Division of Psychiatry Products has indicated that C-SSRS is an acceptable prospective suicidality monitoring assessment.  As primary author of the Columbia-Suicidality Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), I believe the eC-SSRS is a faithful and accurate representation of the interview version of C-SSRS and has been carefully designed to produce consistent outcomes."

The eC-SSRS is an electronic self-rated version of the C-SSRS using interactive voice-response technology that has been validated against the C-SSRS. The eC-SSRS is a fully-structured C-SSRS interview comprised of standardized questions, appropriate follow-up questions, error-handling routines and scoring conventions. Similar to the C-SSRS, the eC-SSRS assesses lifetime suicidality during an initial baseline evaluation and then monitors ideations and behaviors at subsequent study visits. This solution allows for timely identification of potential risks and provides prompt feedback to study sites for follow-up and evaluation.

Dr. John Greist, CEO of Healthcare Technology Systems and an eC-SSRS author, commented that the FDA Division of Psychiatric Products (FDA/DPP) has confirmed that they would like to see prospective suicidality monitoring during each visit in every trial, in all development phases after Phase I. The C-SSRS has been identified by the FDA as the only acceptable assessment instrument currently available for monitoring suicidal ideations and behaviors in clinical trials. Dr. Greist said, "The FDA/DPP has indicated that questions regarding the acceptability of the eC-SSRS can be directed to them by letter as part of a formal inquiry to the Division."

The eC-SSRS has been successfully used in a validation study sponsored by a major pharmaceutical company, using psychiatric inpatients and healthy control volunteers. The results demonstrated convergent validity of the eC-SSRS with the Beck Suicide Scale. In addition, inter-rater reliability between the eC-SSRS and human C-SSRS raters was comparable to reliabilities found between the human raters. The study also demonstrated good criterion validity of the eC-SSRS for discriminating known-groups differences between the study samples. Overall, the eC-SSRS displayed its feasibility, reliability and validity for assessing suicidality prospectively.

Michael Federico, Vice President, ePRO Solutions at ERT, explains: "In the history of drug development, every time a new regulation is introduced, the burden falls to the investigator sites.  This validated eC-SSRS solution reduces this additional site burden. eC-SSRS is now supporting several ongoing clinical trials in large and mid-sized pharmaceutical companies."

SOURCE ERT

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Navigating the minefield of AI in healthcare: Balancing innovation with accuracy