States cut birth control subsidies; Impact of abortion laws hard to ascertain

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

Reuters reports that states are cutting birth control subsidies while The Associated Press writes that it's difficult to gauge what impact anti-abortion laws have on reducing the procedure. The Arizona House gave initial approval to blocking abortion providers from getting federal funding for family planning services through the state. A similar move in Texas, which is now in effect, reverberates.

Reuters: States Slash Birth Control Subsidies As Federal Debate Rages
Even as a national debate rages over contraception insurance, tens of thousands of low-income women and teenagers across the United States have lost access to subsidized birth control as states slash and restructure family planning funds. Montana and New Jersey have eliminated altogether their state family planning programs. New Hampshire cut its funding by 57 percent and five other states made more modest program trims. But the biggest impact, by far, has been in Texas (Simon, 3/2).

The Associated Press: Impact Of State Anti-Abortion Laws Hard To Gauge
When lawmakers take aim at abortion, they draw on an ever-growing arsenal of restrictions and mandates imposed on women, doctors and clinics. But do these measures reduce abortions? It's a question with no simple answer. Abortion providers and abortion-rights advocates say many of the laws -; those requiring ultrasounds, waiting periods and specific types of counseling -; are burdensome and demeaning, but rarely dissuade women who want the procedure (Crary, 3/2).

The Associated Press/Arizona Republic: Arizona House Gives Initial OK To Anti-Abortion Measure
Abortion providers in Arizona would be barred from receiving federal government funding through the state for family planning services under a bill that received preliminary approval from the state House on Friday. State law already prohibits using tax dollars to fund abortions, but Rep. Kimberly Yee, R-Phoenix, said the bill is needed to cut off what she called "backdoor funding" for organizations that provide abortions that are morally objectionable to many taxpayers (Davenport, 3/2).

The Texas Tribune: Planned Parenthood Laments End Of Women's Health Program
The WHP is an extension of the Medicaid program, and is a federally funded program that delivers $9 from the feds for every $1 spent by Texas on women's health. When Texas decided to exclude Planned Parenthood, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services informed HHSC that it would be violating the guidelines of the program and would be ineligible to receive federal funding. That would mean the end of the program, which provides services to about 130,000 Texas women (Theobald, 3/2).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
At stake in mifepristone case: Abortion, FDA’s authority, and return to 1873 obscenity law