Antiviral compound GC-376 shows efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pathogen, has dominated human life all over the world for almost a year. Since the identification of this illness in December 2019, it has taken over 2.2 million lives. Meanwhile, immense economic stress has resulted from the severe restrictions imposed upon human mobility and physical interactions outside one’s own family or household to contain the spread of the virus.

Schematic representation of the experimental design and evaluation of the safety of GC-376 in K18-hACE2 mice. (A) K18-hACE2 were either mock challenged (G1 and G2) or challenged with SARS-CoV-2 at either a high virus dose (1x10ˆ5 TCID50/mouse; G3 and G4) or a low virus dose (1x10ˆ3 TCID50/mouse; G5  and G6). I.P. treatment with vehicle (G1, G3, and G5) or GC-376 (G2, G4, and G6, 40mg/kg day). Subsets of mice were humanely euthanized at 2 and 5 dpc and different tissues were collected. Mice (n=8) received 40mg/kg of GC-376 split in two doses per day for 7 days and (B) weight changes and (C) survival were monitored for 12 days. (D) Mice were humanely euthanized at 14 dpc and lungs, brain, liver, spleen, heart and SI were collected. HE slides were generated and analyzed in comparison with the negative control group. Representative pictures were taken at 20X magnification for all tissues except brain samples that were taken at 4X.
Schematic representation of the experimental design and evaluation of the safety of GC-376 in K18-hACE2 mice. (A) K18-hACE2 were either mock challenged (G1 and G2) or challenged with SARS-CoV-2 at either a high virus dose (1x10ˆ5 TCID50/mouse; G3 and G4) or a low virus dose (1x10ˆ3 TCID50/mouse; G5 and G6). I.P. treatment with vehicle (G1, G3, and G5) or GC-376 (G2, G4, and G6, 40mg/kg day). Subsets of mice were humanely euthanized at 2 and 5 dpc and different tissues were collected. Mice (n=8) received 40mg/kg of GC-376 split in two doses per day for 7 days and (B) weight changes and (C) survival were monitored for 12 days. (D) Mice were humanely euthanized at 14 dpc and lungs, brain, liver, spleen, heart and SI were collected. HE slides were generated and analyzed in comparison with the negative control group. Representative pictures were taken at 20X magnification for all tissues except brain samples that were taken at 4X.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Evaluating GC-376 in vivo

The most feasible way to contain this virus is to vaccinate the global population, and this has led to the accelerated development and release of several COVID-19 vaccines. Over the past months, many potential antivirals have also been identified as deserving further development to target several viral proteins. A recent preprint on the bioRxiv* server deals with one such molecule, the viral main protease (Mpro) inhibitor GC-376.

While in vitro studies have demonstrated the inhibition of SARS-CoV Mpro in the presence of GC376, and its potential anti-SARS-CoV-2 activity, it has not, like other Mpro inhibitors, been tested in vivo. The current paper aims to report the in vivo antiviral activity of GC-376.

Study details

The researchers used the transgenic K18-hACE2 mouse model, which comprises mice that have been modified by the introduction of the human angiotensin-converting enzyme type 2 (hACE2) receptor under the control of the keratin 18 promoter. This animal model develops the clinical disease and lethal infection following challenge with the SARS-CoV-2.

The researchers challenged the mice with two different viral doses of SARS-CoV-2. Controls were mock-challenged. Three hours after the viral challenge, the mice were treated with GC-376 or a vehicle for seven days.

The mock-challenged mice showed no ill-effects whether treated with the vehicle or GC-376. The virus-exposed GC-376-treated mice developed dose-dependent effects in terms of clinical disease.

Mice in the high-dose challenge group, untreated, either died or became so severely ill that they were euthanized. In the high-dose challenge GC-376-treated group, there was a similar outcome, but one in five mice survived. Though this difference failed to attain significance, the loss of body weight between the two groups was significantly different.

In the low-challenge untreated group, disease progression occurred albeit at a slower rate, indicating a dose-dependent effect of viral challenge. Ultimately, 60% of challenged mice survived. However, there was no clear improvement in the clinical outcome of mice in the low-challenge GC-376-treated and untreated groups, indicating the drug has only a small benefit in terms of clinical signs and outcome.

Brain viral loads lower in GC-376-treated mice

The researchers found that mice treated with GC-376 showed high levels of replication in various organs. The viral titers increased in many tissues over time, indicating systemic spread.

However, the brain samples in GC-376-treated groups showed reduced viral loads, though the variation between individuals in the low-virus challenge GC-376-treatment groups was considerable. In this group, the viral load in the brain was often undetectable, but this was not correlated with a higher survival compared to controls.

Lack of toxicity

The detailed examination of various tissues in infected mice shows that GC-376 does not produce obvious acute toxicity, but on the other hand, the drug may alleviate the extent of inflammation and virus-induced tissue damage observed following infection.

What are the implications?

The researchers note that high virus challenge led to severe disease and uniformly lethal outcome, versus delayed disease and 60% survival in the low virus challenge group. This study confirms the suitability of this transgenic mouse model as a platform to evaluate disease outcomes and host responses, even though the mechanisms of lethality may not correspond to those operating in humans.

The study also shows the safety of GC-376. The drug-treated low virus challenge groups showed only modest differences in terms of clinical signs, weight loss, and survival from exposed controls. However, further findings include the presence of lower viral loads, milder tissue lesions and reduced inflammation compared to exposed controls.

The lower viral loads in the brain following GC-376 treatment are important since neurological involvement is seen in many COVID-19 patients, and are associated with severe or critical disease in two-thirds of the cases.

The milder lesions and the apparently favorable effect of GC-376 on virus-induced inflammation could also be important, since the dysregulated immune response with multisystemic inflammation is considered a major and often fatal complication of COVID-19.

The researchers suggest that this shows that GC-376 can act as a SARS-CoV-2 antiviral in vivo. Its modest activity was expected from its moderate activity in vitro. The efficacy would need to be improved by ten- to a hundred-fold in order to present useful therapeutic activity.

This may be possible by optimizing the structure of the compound, using higher doses or by combining it with other antivirals or anti-inflammatory drugs like dexamethasone. Future studies in this direction would be useful.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Apr 4 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2023, April 04). Antiviral compound GC-376 shows efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 18, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210202/Antiviral-compound-GC-376-shows-efficacy-against-SARS-CoV-2-in-vivo.aspx.

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "Antiviral compound GC-376 shows efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo". News-Medical. 18 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210202/Antiviral-compound-GC-376-shows-efficacy-against-SARS-CoV-2-in-vivo.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "Antiviral compound GC-376 shows efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210202/Antiviral-compound-GC-376-shows-efficacy-against-SARS-CoV-2-in-vivo.aspx. (accessed April 18, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2023. Antiviral compound GC-376 shows efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in vivo. News-Medical, viewed 18 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210202/Antiviral-compound-GC-376-shows-efficacy-against-SARS-CoV-2-in-vivo.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Research confirms no association between SARS-CoV-2 and childhood asthma diagnoses