Burn pit smoke exposure leaves lasting carbon particles in veterans’ lungs

A new study led by researchers at National Jewish Health provides quantitative evidence linking burn pit smoke exposure during military deployment to increases in harmful carbon-based particles in the lungs of post-9/11 veterans with distal lung disease.

The study, published in Scientific Reports, analyzed lung tissue from deployed veterans using a novel quantitative microscopy technique that measures particulate matter directly within lung samples. Researchers found that veterans with deployment-related lung disease had significantly higher levels of anthracotic (carbon-based) pigment in their lungs compared to healthy controls, and that this burden was strongly associated with reported exposure to burn pit smoke.

Burn pits were widely used during post-9/11 military operations, yet linking specific inhalational exposures to long-term lung disease has been challenging. This study provides objective, tissue-based evidence that burn pit smoke exposure leaves a measurable impact in the lungs that may contribute to disease development."

Cecile S. Rose, MD, MPH, senior author of the study and pulmonologist at National Jewish Health

Researchers examined surgical lung biopsy samples from 24 post-9/11 veterans with deployment-related lung disease, comparing them with samples from smokers with respiratory bronchiolitis and from healthy controls. Using a validated quantitative microscopy for particulate matter (QM-PM) technique, investigators measured two key indicators of exposure: anthracotic pigment fraction, reflecting retained carbon-based particles from combustion sources, and birefringent dust density, indicating retained silica and silicate particles.

After adjusting for age, veterans (who were mainly non-smokers) with lung disease had anthracotic pigment levels similar to smokers with respiratory bronchiolitis and more than three times higher than healthy controls. Importantly, these higher pigment levels were significantly associated with reported burn pit smoke exposure, but not with sandstorms or diesel exhaust.

"This approach allows us to move beyond self-reported exposure histories and directly measure what remains in the lung tissue," said Jeremy T. Hua, MD, MPH, lead author of the study. "The strong association between burn pit smoke exposure and anthracotic particle burden is particularly compelling."

Lung diseases, including bronchiolitis and emphysema, affect the small airways and alveoli and are increasingly recognized among previously deployed service members. While prior studies have identified elevated mineral dust in some veterans' lungs, this study highlights the potential role of carbonaceous particles from burn pit smoke in disease pathogenesis.

"These findings help clarify how complex deployment-related exposures may translate into lasting lung injury," Hua said. "They also underscore the importance of continued research, monitoring, and care for veterans experiencing unexplained respiratory symptoms."

Source:
Journal reference:

Hua, J. T., et al. (2025). Quantitative lung particulate analysis links increased anthracotic pigment burden to burn pit exposure in post-9/11 veterans with distal lung disease. Scientific Reports. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-27793-1. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-27793-1

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
What Americans eat is driving global nutrition research