Industry leaders offer solutions for health care reform

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The Chicago Tribune published a series of articles on industry's solutions for health care reform. The paper "turned to Chicago-area leaders in three key segments of the industry: insurers, medical providers and pharmacy," and presented their "thoughts on how best to expand medical-care coverage to all Americans."

Pharmacists: "By helping patients make better choices, pharmacists say they can help save billions." But for "medication therapy management" to be effective, they’ll need higher payments. This article was highlighted in yesterday's edition of the Kaiser Daily Report.

Insurers: Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Illinois president Paul Boulis says that for a health care expansion to be successful, "all consumers need to be enrolled in a plan." Without a mandate, "consumers could defer getting coverage until they need medical care, and that can lead to higher premium costs for those with insurance." Mandated coverage allows insurers to "spread the risk" and provides them with a larger pool of money to help them pay for claims, which "helps them turn a profit and provide benefits and services to more people." Boulis says the recession has been bad for business. "For the first time in a quarter century," Blue Cross and Blue Shield expects enrollment to drop this year. A mandate would "get everybody under the umbrella," Boulis says, but he says that doesn't necessarily mean costs will level off. "He worries about the millions of people who may have been avoiding the doctor's office or ignoring their ailments flocking to the health-care system. 'A good portion of those people are going to have myriad problems,' he said. 'You are going to have to be very savvy about what you cover.'" But numerous health plans, including Blue Cross, has told Congress they "would not reject coverage for consumers with pre-existing medical conditions" if a mandate is included in the overhaul.

Doctors: For health reform to be effective, doctors in small practices must get "funds and support to equip their offices with the latest technology and quality data," says Dr. Lee Sacks, the "top administrative physician at the largest provider of medical care in Chicago." "Most Americans receive their care from practices of fewer than five doctors," and those doctors complain of "lack of infrastructure to effectively address future patient needs." Sacks' provider organization, Advocate Health Care, lends "resources to the more than 3,200 independent doctors, largely in small practices" who are trying to improve their quality of care. He says that organizing small practices is needed to "effectively implement health-care reform that is high-quality and cost-effective." Some of the assistance, Sacks says, "is coaching and training, and some of that is infrastructure, data and feedback," including electronic health records. He expects additional money will be needed to "offset the additional coverage" (Japsen, 6/4).


Kaiser Health NewsThis article was reprinted from khn.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

  1. Bill Watson Bill Watson United States says:

    Dispensing health care efficiently, and collecting the money to pay for it cheaply, that's the purpose of the exercise, no one can compete with the government at these two tasks, no insurance company, HMO, or hospital; nobody.

    America’s Veteran Administration is the largest, lowest cost; best outcome producing at any cost, health care delivery system in the US, it uses the world’s best medical software, and it has been controlling the problems with access, cost, quality, and malpractice successfully for years.

    A national sales tax could pay for the public portion of a dual choice, public or private system.

    The private care option would allow individuals or businesses the unlimited choice of doctors, clinics, hospitals, timing, and treatments, Ford Fiesta or Rolls-Royce, but it would require the user to pay privately for their health services, either by self pay, company pay, private insurance, whatever, but government funded programs should only be distributed through the new public system to assure cost control and outcomes.

    Private insurance and care providers would no longer be required to subsidize indigent and pre condition patients who would be treated free at public facilities.

    (The Best Care Anywhere by Phillip Longman)

    www.washingtonmonthly.com/.../0501.longman.html

    True health care reform offering individuals and businesses a choice between dual systems either free public care or private pay private care, you choose, would leave no one behind without care, and it would cost less than the $2 trillion dollars we spend annually for our current systems.

    A national sales tax would be the most efficient funding source, which in conjunction with the VA's delivery and software records systems means we would not need to reinvent the wheel to establish a scalable public system to rapidly serve the entire country.

    The system could be jump-started by acquiring health delivery systems around the country that would choose to sell to, and be integrated into, the new public National Health Care System.

    Building new public health care facilities will produce capital assets that will continue to serve Americans for generations, and provide millions of construction jobs today, and millions of new health care jobs forever.

    For individuals selecting public care; all prescribed care and medications would be free, no insurance, no co pays, no precondition exceptions, free period.

    Businesses large and small choosing the public care option could also free themselves from all financial burdens or any involvement in any way for the health services their employees receive, whether it’s a one truck plumber or General Motors.

    A national health care system should take over state and local government health care systems as part of complete health care reform which would assure enhanced cost controls, consistent operating standards, and it would relieve local funding problems while providing total transferability for patients.

    An OMB study comparing this to other reforms would be fascinating.  

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Study links symptomatic dizziness to higher mortality risk