Views on AIDS: Despite advances, still no cure, no vaccine, and indifference grows

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The Washington Post: Turning The Tide With AIDS
The story of the AIDS pandemic has been grim for so long that optimism seems hardly possible. But as the 19th International AIDS conference opens in Washington on Sunday, there is hope for control of a disease that has killed nearly 35 million people over three decades and 1.7 million in the past year. Unfortunately, there is still no cure, nor a vaccine proven safe and effective. But a headline in the New England Journal of Medicine asks, "The Beginning of the End of AIDS?" This is not wishful thinking (7/21).

The Washington Post: AIDS Remains A Problem. But Is It Still A Priority For The Gay Community?
HIV no longer seems to be a priority for some in the gay community. Foundations focused on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people, which have historically provided millions of dollars in crucial funding for HIV service organizations, are shifting their resources elsewhere. The fight is different now. There is a lack of urgency among some well-off, white gay men, a segment of the LGBT community that was crucial in battling HIV and turning the tide in the 1980s and '90s (Daniel Tietz, 7/20).

Boston Globe: A Quiet Breakthrough On HIV
Thirty years into the battle against HIV, medical researchers still haven't discovered a cure or a vaccine. But the Food and Drug Administration's recent approval of a new use for the antiretroviral drug Truvada marked a quiet breakthrough that could bring them closer to that goal (7/21).

Philadelphia Inquirer: With Return To The U.S., AIDS Group Focuses On Girls
United Nations statistics show that young women are most likely to be infected with HIV due to several factors, including a lack of education. Yet only 2 cents of every international-aid dollar directed toward fighting AIDS focuses on young women. Women ages 15-24 have twice the infection rate of young men. This affects society at large. Without HIV, the mortality rate among women with children would be 20 percent lower. More orphans would still have a mother (7/22).


http://www.kaiserhealthnews.orgThis article was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Kaiser Health News, an editorially independent news service, is a program of the Kaiser Family Foundation, a nonpartisan health care policy research organization unaffiliated with Kaiser Permanente.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Oxford University and Brazil partner to advance malaria vaccine development