A study on COVID vaccinated vs. unvaccinated that required hospitalization

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

In a recent study published on the medRxiv* preprint server, a team of researchers compared the demographic, clinical, and outcome-related variables of fully vaccinated and boosted (FV&B) and unvaccinated (UV) patients requiring hospitalization for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Study: Fully Vaccinated and Boosted Patients Requiring Hospitalization for COVID-19: an Observational Cohort Analysis. Image Credit: Halfpoint / Shutterstock.com

Study: Fully Vaccinated and Boosted Patients Requiring Hospitalization for COVID-19: an Observational Cohort Analysis. Image Credit: Halfpoint / Shutterstock.com

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Introduction

In an attempt to end the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, global scientists and governments worked together to develop and distribute an effective vaccine against SARS-CoV-2. However, the severity of COVID-19 has been aggravated by the continuous mutation of the virus, which could lead to a decrease in the efficacy of current vaccines.

The effect of newly emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants on the efficacy of vaccines remains a concern for global public health. Therefore, to restrict the potential of new variants, the United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) sanctioned booster vaccinations for individuals who had completed the primary vaccination series. These individuals were eligible for the booster dose at least six months after receiving the primary dose of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines or two months after receiving the primary dose of the Johnson & Johnson SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.

About the Study

In the current study, the researchers aimed to compare the variables that characterize patients with severe SARS-CoV-2 infection requiring hospitalization among FV&B and UV patients by evaluating adult patients who required hospitalization due to severe COVID-19.

The researchers compared demographic and health history data of patients who were FV&B with those who were UV and required hospitalization for COVID-19 during the same period of time. They also studied clinical variables in the FV&B population and identified the variables that correlated with the characteristics of patients in the emergency department (ED) with the need for intensive care unit (ICU) admission.

Adult patients 18 years of age or older who required hospitalization and had a discharge diagnosis of active COVID-19 were included in the study. Patients who had COVID-19 during a previous hospitalization and pediatric patients were excluded from the study.

Enrollment profile of COVID-19 emergency and inpatient encounters.

Study findings

Between August 12, 2021, and December 6, 2021, 10,236 ED encounters with a primary diagnosis of COVID-19 were observed. Among these, encounters discharged from the ED, fully vaccinated but not boosted encounters, and partially vaccinated encounters were excluded from the study. Out of the remaining cases, 2.2% were FV&B and 97.8% were UV.

The median age of individuals in the FV&B cohort was 74 and that in the UV cohort was 58. In addition, the percentage of immunocompromised individuals and those with pre-existing end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the FV&B cohort were 32.3% and 18.5%, respectively, while in UV individuals were 0.4% and 1.8%, respectively.

Mechanical ventilation was needed in 7.7% of FV&B patients and 11.1% of UV patients. In-hospital mortality was 7.7% and 12.1% for the FV&B and the UV groups, respectively.

Nearly 91% of the FV&B individuals exhibited upper respiratory symptoms or systemic symptoms, 84.6% had respiratory symptoms, 66.2% exhibited systemic symptoms, and 53.8% exhibited fatigue. COVID-19 symptoms were shown by 42% of the patients less than 12 days after receiving the booster dose. Among the patients requiring ICU care, 45% experienced COVID-19 symptoms less than 12 days after receiving the booster dose.

Almost 64% of the FV&B patients requiring ICU care were males of a median age of 71. Among FV&B patients who required ICU care, 36.4% died, 27.2% were discharged to a skilled nursing facility (SNF), 18.2% were discharged to a rehabilitation center, and 18.2% were discharged home.

Characteristics and outcomes of 11 fully vaccinated and boosted patients with COVID-19 requiring intensive care admission.

Conclusion

The researchers concluded that booster doses provided protection against severe COVID-19 symptoms and also observed that the number of patients requiring mechanical ventilation and use of vasopressors, as well as in-hospital mortality, were lower in the FV&B cohorts as compared to the UV cohorts, despite a higher risk for in-hospital mortality in the FV&B cohort.

When the researchers compared the FV&B patients who required ICU care to those who did not, it was observed that there may not have been enough time for the booster dose in these patients to be effective in preventing COVID-19 symptoms.

Decreased in-hospital mortality was observed in FV&B patients compared to UV patients, even though the former group was older and had a higher rate of pre-existing ESRD, higher proportion of immunocompromised state, and a higher proportion of immunocompromised state risk of in-hospital death in the FV&B cohort. It was observed that even among elderly patients with significant comorbidities, a booster dose might safeguard the patient against increased severity of symptoms.

Taken together, further investigations are required to understand the protection provided by booster vaccines and diagnose the risk factors in the FV&B population.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Feb 23 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Susha Cheriyedath

Written by

Susha Cheriyedath

Susha is a scientific communication professional holding a Master's degree in Biochemistry, with expertise in Microbiology, Physiology, Biotechnology, and Nutrition. After a two-year tenure as a lecturer from 2000 to 2002, where she mentored undergraduates studying Biochemistry, she transitioned into editorial roles within scientific publishing. She has accumulated nearly two decades of experience in medical communication, assuming diverse roles in research, writing, editing, and editorial management.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. (2023, February 23). A study on COVID vaccinated vs. unvaccinated that required hospitalization. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 18, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220110/A-study-on-COVID-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-that-required-hospitalization.aspx.

  • MLA

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "A study on COVID vaccinated vs. unvaccinated that required hospitalization". News-Medical. 18 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220110/A-study-on-COVID-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-that-required-hospitalization.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Cheriyedath, Susha. "A study on COVID vaccinated vs. unvaccinated that required hospitalization". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220110/A-study-on-COVID-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-that-required-hospitalization.aspx. (accessed April 18, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Cheriyedath, Susha. 2023. A study on COVID vaccinated vs. unvaccinated that required hospitalization. News-Medical, viewed 18 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20220110/A-study-on-COVID-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-that-required-hospitalization.aspx.

Comments

  1. Olivier Archambault Bouffard Olivier Archambault Bouffard Canada says:

    Is it possible the severity of disease in the FV&B has been increased by coincidence of infection and receiving booster in a small period of time?

  2. Marc Savard Marc Savard United States says:

    I don't see the explicit breakdown of numbers for percentage of in-patients who required IC?

  3. G R G R United States says:

    "Out of the remaining cases, 2.2% were FV&B and 97.8% were UV."
    I find it interesting that the author includes those with one or two doses in with the UV (unvaccinated).

  4. John O'Thunder John O'Thunder United States says:

    So,
    36% of those admitted into the hospital had partial or full vaccination.
    64% of those admitted, were unvaccinated.

  5. Hannah Cole Hannah Cole People's Republic of China says:

    Exosomes play a key role in the regulation of important cellular physiological and pathological functions, which are closely associated with almost all disease areas such as cancer, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New vaccine promises broad protection against SARS-CoV-2 and other sarbecoviruses