Researchers call for deeper studies on wildfire smoke health risks

As wildfires increase in frequency and intensity across regions like the western United States, smoke exposure is becoming more widespread and prolonged. Yet current knowledge gaps make it harder to develop targeted interventions or guidelines. Despite this growing exposure, scientists say the underlying health risks remain poorly understood.

A review paper published in Frontiers in Public Health argues that the health risks of wildfire smoke, while widely acknowledged, remain poorly understood at a biological level, and calls for a major shift in research priorities.

Synthesizing existing studies on wildfire smoke, the paper by Veronica L. Penuelas and David D. Lo of the University of California, Riverside highlights that most research relies on population-level correlations rather than direct biomedical evidence of harm.

"The paper is essentially a call to action," said Lo, a distinguished professor of biomedical sciences in the School of Medicine and director of the BREATHE (Bridging Regional Ecology, Aerosolized Toxins, and Health Effects) Lab at UCR. "Very little research on wildfire smoke effects examines the medical or biological harms. Most studies are based on statistical correlations between assumed exposures and health outcomes in communities."

The review also emphasizes that wildfire smoke is not a static pollutant. As it travels, it undergoes chemical transformations, producing "aged" particles that may differ significantly from freshly emitted smoke.

Wildfire smoke is not a single, uniform exposure. It changes over time and distance. Understanding those transformations is critical to understanding its health effects."

Veronica L. Penuelas, a doctoral student in Lo's lab

The review concludes that addressing wildfire smoke as a public health threat will require moving beyond broad correlations and investing in detailed biomedical research that identifies specific harms, clarifies underlying mechanisms, and links environmental exposure to biological effects.

"Until then, the true scale and mechanisms of wildfire smoke's impact on human health may remain only partially understood," Lo said.

Source:
Journal reference:

Penuelas, V. L., & Lo, D. D. (2026). From combustion to consequence: respiratory health concerns from primary and aged smoke at the wildland–urban interface. Frontiers in Public Health. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2026.1763671. https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/public-health/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1763671/full

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Could a simple milk habit help prevent strokes? New research points to potential benefits