AI powered screening-test for COVID-19

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

A new study by researchers at the University of Oxford and Harvard University and published on the preprint server medRxiv* in July 2020 reports the use of artificial intelligence (AI) to screen patients presenting or admitted to hospital for COVID-19. This could help triage patients in low-testing settings and help reduce infection risk.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic is spreading far and wide partly due to the delay in diagnosis, especially when the presenting symptoms are nonspecific. The use of RT-PCR can identify the presence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), but the results may take up to 48 hours. There is, therefore, an urgent need for quick and immediate testing to identify this infection at the point of care. This will expedite required caregiving as well as rapid triage and control of infection.

The use of electronic healthcare records (EHR) can be adapted to this purpose, by using machine learning to pick up signs of COVID-19 infection while remaining within the ordinary hospital testing regime. The current study looked at the use of AI trained from clinical data that are routinely collected at hospital presentation, to allow rapid screening for this illness within an hour of being seen by the first healthcare provider.

The study includes more than 170,500 consecutive presentations to either emergency or acute medical departments at a large hospital in the UK. After training the AI machines, they simulated the actual performance of the systems at different points of the epidemic by test sets having a different prevalence of the infection. The researchers examined the predictive values.

They then conducted a validation study on all the patients between April 20, 2020, and May 6, 2020, comparing the predictions to the PCR test results. Almost 115,400 and over 72,300 patients presented and were admitted, respectively.

The researchers developed two models to screen for COVID-19, one in admitted patients and one for all patients presenting at hospital. They found that both models could be trained using routine laboratory blood tests performed at presentation, blood gas results at the point of care, and vital signs. They found that the first and third had the highest predictive value for COVID-19.

The model for detecting COVID-19 among presenting patients had 77% sensitivity but 96% specificity. For those admitted with COVID-19, the sensitivity and specificity was 77% and 95%, respectively.

Over a two week period, these models were prospectively validated against RT-PCR for all patients. They found that the presentation and admission models scored 92% accuracy, with high negative predictive values. In other words, more than 99% of patients for whom the test was negative were truly free of COVID-19.

Implications

The researchers sum up, “Our Emergency Department and Admission models effectively identify patients with COVID-19 amongst all patients presenting and admitted to hospital, using data typically available within the first hour of presentation.”

When the prevalence is low, at 5% or less, these models can achieve a negative predictive value of over 99%, which means they can exclude the disease. When the prevalence is much higher, at above 25%, the models can be adapted to provide a higher positive predictive value of above 83%, which is required. The ability of the models to be adapted to changing conditions as the pandemic continues to spread, and change is an important advantage of this approach.

The high negative predictive values allow their use as a screening test so that patients presenting to emergency rooms can be quickly screened for COVID-19. This will help with giving immediate care, guiding patients through the diagnostic and admission process safely, and even forming a pre-test group for formal RT-PCR when the latter are limited in availability.

The study is important in that it has the largest dataset of any AI-based COVID-19 laboratory study until now, with the large non-COVID-19 patient cohort allowing a broad spectrum of undiagnosed infections and other presentations to be used for training.

Not only does the use of laboratory blood tests and vital signs preclude specialized testing that is not available in the first hour of presentation, but may help identify factors that put individuals at higher risk for COVID-19 or other similar-appearing conditions. Thirdly, this would be ideal for urgent diagnoses in both advanced and poor countries, which have a deficit of testing kits. Finally, they are easily scalable.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • Mar 25 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Dr. Liji Thomas

Written by

Dr. Liji Thomas

Dr. Liji Thomas is an OB-GYN, who graduated from the Government Medical College, University of Calicut, Kerala, in 2001. Liji practiced as a full-time consultant in obstetrics/gynecology in a private hospital for a few years following her graduation. She has counseled hundreds of patients facing issues from pregnancy-related problems and infertility, and has been in charge of over 2,000 deliveries, striving always to achieve a normal delivery rather than operative.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Thomas, Liji. (2023, March 25). AI powered screening-test for COVID-19. News-Medical. Retrieved on May 07, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200710/AI-powered-screening-test-for-COVID-19.aspx.

  • MLA

    Thomas, Liji. "AI powered screening-test for COVID-19". News-Medical. 07 May 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200710/AI-powered-screening-test-for-COVID-19.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Thomas, Liji. "AI powered screening-test for COVID-19". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200710/AI-powered-screening-test-for-COVID-19.aspx. (accessed May 07, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Thomas, Liji. 2023. AI powered screening-test for COVID-19. News-Medical, viewed 07 May 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20200710/AI-powered-screening-test-for-COVID-19.aspx.

Comments

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
New study reveals increased risk of allergic diseases after COVID-19 infection