U.S. District Court grants preliminary injunction to POZEN's Treximet patent lawsuit

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

POZEN Inc. (NASDAQ: POZN), a pharmaceutical company committed to transforming medicine that transforms lives, announced today that the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas has granted a preliminary injunction ordering Par Pharmaceutical Inc. (Par) not to make, use, sell, offer to sell, or import into the United States a generic version of sumatriptan/naproxen sodium that competes with Treximet® (sumatriptan and naproxen sodium) sold by GlaxoSmithKline in the United States under an exclusive license from the Company.

The order was entered in connection with the patent infringement lawsuit pending among the Company and Par, Alphapharm Pty Ltd. (Alphapharm), Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. (Teva), and Dr. Reddy's Laboratories, Inc. (DRL) relating to the submission to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) of Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) by the four generic companies and the generic companies' plans to market sumatriptan and naproxen sodium products pursuant to such ANDAs, which the Company contends infringe three of its patents covering Treximet. Teva was dismissed without prejudice from the consolidated litigation in April 2010. The case against the other three defendants was tried before Judge Leonard Davis in the Eastern District of Texas on October 12-15, 2010. A decision is pending in the case.

For purposes of evaluating POZEN's motion for a preliminary injunction, Judge Davis focused his analysis on two asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,586,458, one of three patents challenged by the defendants in the case. Judge Davis concluded that the Company had shown "that it is likely to succeed against Par on the merits of its infringement claim of the '458 patent." The Court further concluded that POZEN "is likely to succeed against Defendants' invalidity claims" concerning the '458 patent and that it "does not find that Defendants' arguments raise a substantial question regarding the enforceability of the '458 patent."

The injunction will remain in effect until a final decision is issued in the pending patent litigation. The Company continues to believe that its patents covering Treximet are valid and enforceable, and that these beliefs will be upheld by the Court.

Source:

POZEN Inc.

Comments

  1. Melissa Melissa United States says:

    I have been taken Treximet for miagraines for about 5 years. I sufford a Ischimic Stroke on Nov. 11, 2012 I lost use and feeling of the right side of my body. I have been off work for 6weeks and I went back to the doctor on friday to find out that I have to be off work for 8 more weeks. I was checking to see if there my be other peple that have sufford from this also. Thanks Melissa

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
MGI Enters Strategic Partnership with Prepaire Labs to Advance Drug Discovery and Precision Medicine