Limited immune responses three months after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination among elderly

NewsGuard 100/100 Score

The ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has adversely impacted the elderly, with over 95% of the COVID-19-related deaths occurring in individuals over 60 years.

However, residents at long-term care facilities (LTCF) have suffered higher mortality risks than individuals of the same age groups residing in general communities.

The higher mortality rate in this population is speculated to precipitate from residing in congregated settings—which increases the risk of transmission of infections.

Currently available COVID-19 vaccines are both safe and efficacious and aid in developing humoral immunity and cellular protection. However, data on elderly and geriatric populations is lacking. As people get older, immunosenescence prevails – characterized by a progressive increase in a pro-inflammatory state along with a reduced immune response to infections and vaccinations. Therefore, there exists an immediate need to evaluate the quality and extent of immune responses among the elderly, which might be immensely important in developing special severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination calendars tailored to the immune requirements of the older populations.

Study: Limited immune responses after three months of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 uninfected elders living in long-term care facilities. Image Credit: Rido / Shutterstock
Study: Limited immune responses after three months of BNT162b2 vaccine in SARS-CoV-2 uninfected elders living in long-term care facilities. Image Credit: Rido / Shutterstock

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

The Study

To help comprehend how anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral responses are elicited among older individuals, a prospective study was undertaken to evaluate the anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral response elicited upon COVID-19 vaccination in 82 residents living in LTCF, who had recovered from a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, and SARS-CoV-2-uninfected individuals.

In this study, published on the medRxiv* preprint server, the humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 was assessed before and after three months of administration of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccination (Pfizer-BioNTech). In addition, elders' humoral responses were compared to those of a younger group, and a functional neutralization experiment against the Wuhan-Hu-1 (WH1) virus and the Delta variant was carried out.

This prospective observational CoronAVI@S study recruited 98 participants above the age of 65 from three LTCF in the Northern area of Barcelona (Spain). Plasma samples were derived six months after LTCF outbreaks (September-November 2020) and three months following the completion of the vaccine schedule (April-May 2021).

To assess the infection history of all pre-vaccine samples, SARS-CoV-2 serology was studied. Before the vaccination, elders were divided into infected and uninfected groups based on their polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and serology results. Then, at the beginning of the year 2021, both study groups were vaccinated with the BNT16b2 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). A subsequent sample was obtained at a median of 2.8 months after vaccination; a second serology test against NP-protein (NP) was conducted in the uninfected individuals.

The younger participant group ranged from 22 to 64 years. Pre-vaccine and post-vaccine blood samples were matched between the two groups of patients.

Findings

Hypertension, arthritis, dementia, and diabetes were the most common chronic diseases diagnosed among the senior participants. During the LTCF outbreak, individuals were tested using Real-Time PCR (RT-PCR). It was found that 84% of residents included in the study had encountered a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection – the median age of 87 years and 80% females. Residents who remained uninfected prior to vaccination had a median age of 79 years, and 50% were females. Only one uninfected resident got infected with SARS-CoV-2 after vaccination—with mild symptoms.

Comparison of humoral response and neutralizing activity between uninfected and infected individuals at different ages after three months from BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Panel A: Levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) against S2+RBD proteins quantified in plasma from uninfected and infected elders by ELISA. Panel B: SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody levels(against S2+RBD proteins) after vaccination across ages in infected and uninfected participants. Panel C: Neutralizing activity against WH1 virus before and after three months of vaccine administration in infected and uninfected elders living in LTCF. Panel D: Neutralizing activity against WH1 after vaccination across ages in infected and uninfected participants. Panel E: Correlation of neutralizing activity after vaccination with age in participants infected and uninfected. Correlation coefficient and p-values were obtained from Spearman correlation. Panel F: Ratio of plasma neutralization titer per total SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in younger and older individuals, sub-grouped by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection history. Median values are indicated; P-values were obtained from Mann–Whitney test for comparison between groups (Panels A, B, C, D and F), Wilcolxon for paired tests (panel C) and Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison between ranges of age for infected and uninfected groups (Panel B and D). In all panels, uninfected and infected individuals at vaccination are indicated in turquoise and purple, respectively. Uninfected resident who got infected after vaccinations is indicated in red and was excluded from the statistical analysis.
Comparison of humoral response and neutralizing activity between uninfected and infected individuals at different ages after three months from BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Panel A: Levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) against S2+RBD proteins quantified in plasma from uninfected and infected elders by ELISA. Panel B: SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG antibody levels(against S2+RBD proteins) after vaccination across ages in infected and uninfected participants. Panel C: Neutralizing activity against WH1 virus before and after three months of vaccine administration in infected and uninfected elders living in LTCF. Panel D: Neutralizing activity against WH1 after vaccination across ages in infected and uninfected participants. Panel E: Correlation of neutralizing activity after vaccination with age in participants infected and uninfected. Correlation coefficient and p-values were obtained from Spearman correlation. Panel F: Ratio of plasma neutralization titer per total SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies in younger and older individuals, sub-grouped by previous SARS-CoV-2 infection history. Median values are indicated; P-values were obtained from Mann–Whitney test for comparison between groups (Panels A, B, C, D and F), Wilcolxon for paired tests (panel C) and Kruskal–Wallis test for comparison between ranges of age for infected and uninfected groups (Panel B and D). In all panels, uninfected and infected individuals at vaccination are indicated in turquoise and purple, respectively. Uninfected resident who got infected after vaccinations is indicated in red and was excluded from the statistical analysis.

Individuals who had been infected with SARS-CoV-2 prior to vaccination had considerably higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 specific IgG, IgA, and IgM antibodies than those who had not been infected. In addition, infected elders had a significant rise in all immunoglobulin isotypes between pre-and post-vaccine samples. In contrast, uninfected elders had measurable levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG and IgA antibodies three months post-vaccination but no IgM.

Notably, those who became infected after vaccination exhibited similar levels of specific SARS-CoV-2 antibodies to that of the infected and vaccinated participants. The elderly participants had higher levels of IgG antibodies than the younger participants who had previously been infected.

The affected residents were detected with higher levels of SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies six months after the infection (and prior immunization) than the younger population. Meanwhile, in uninfected vaccinated patients, the levels of circulating specific SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies tended to decline, irrespective of their age, and the levels were negatively correlated with age.

In all the elderly, SARS-CoV-2 vaccination boosted antibody titers, with neutralizing capacity being considerably higher in participants with a previous history of SARS-CoV-2 infection. There was a median fold increase in antibody titers of 18.7 for the infected population among the pre-vaccine and post-vaccine samples.

After immunization, residents who contracted the infection had similar titers of neutralizing antibodies as the infected group. Whereas subjects who had already been infected had identical levels of plasma neutralization capacity, irrespective of their age and the severity of COVID-19. Compared to the younger group, the infected elderly elicited a higher spike in humoral responses after immunization. On the other hand, uninfected vaccinated subgroups showed a progressive drop in neutralizing titers over time.

These findings suggested that uninfected older adults have lower neutralizing antibody titers and may be more susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection than previously infected individuals of the same age group.

In addition, it was reported that the mRNA vaccination elicits efficient neutralizing antibodies in the elderly, though at lower levels. It was established that Delta forms of variants of concern (VOC) generate a much lower plasma neutralizing capacity than WH1 in all elders and younger individuals, regardless of the host's past infection status.

In vaccinated uninfected individuals, a progressive decline was detected in the neutralization levels across all ages against the Delta variant similar to those against the original virus (WH1). However, in uninfected vaccinated individuals above 65 years, neutralizing capacity against the Delta variant was barely detectable. Remarkably, in people who had previously been infected with SARS-CoV-2, their neutralization capacities against the Delta variant increased dramatically with age. In comparison to all other groups, the elderly elicited a stronger cross-neutralization of the Delta variant.

The findings indicated that only uninfected people who do not acquire adequate immune responses would benefit from a booster vaccine dose. A tailored vaccination calendar is required to meet the immunity needs of this vulnerable population. Significantly, hybrid immunity appears to be active in the elderly and may be helpful in designing vaccination boosting campaigns.

This news article was a review of a preliminary scientific report that had not undergone peer-review at the time of publication. Since its initial publication, the scientific report has now been peer reviewed and accepted for publication in a Scientific Journal. Links to the preliminary and peer-reviewed reports are available in the Sources section at the bottom of this article. View Sources

Journal references:

Article Revisions

  • May 15 2023 - The preprint preliminary research paper that this article was based upon was accepted for publication in a peer-reviewed Scientific Journal. This article was edited accordingly to include a link to the final peer-reviewed paper, now shown in the sources section.
Nidhi Saha

Written by

Nidhi Saha

I am a medical content writer and editor. My interests lie in public health awareness and medical communication. I have worked as a clinical dentist and as a consultant research writer in an Indian medical publishing house. It is my constant endeavor is to update knowledge on newer treatment modalities relating to various medical fields. I have also aided in proofreading and publication of manuscripts in accredited medical journals. I like to sketch, read and listen to music in my leisure time.

Citations

Please use one of the following formats to cite this article in your essay, paper or report:

  • APA

    Saha, Nidhi. (2023, May 15). Limited immune responses three months after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination among elderly. News-Medical. Retrieved on April 25, 2024 from https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211123/Limited-immune-responses-three-months-after-Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccination-among-elderly.aspx.

  • MLA

    Saha, Nidhi. "Limited immune responses three months after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination among elderly". News-Medical. 25 April 2024. <https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211123/Limited-immune-responses-three-months-after-Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccination-among-elderly.aspx>.

  • Chicago

    Saha, Nidhi. "Limited immune responses three months after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination among elderly". News-Medical. https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211123/Limited-immune-responses-three-months-after-Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccination-among-elderly.aspx. (accessed April 25, 2024).

  • Harvard

    Saha, Nidhi. 2023. Limited immune responses three months after Pfizer-BioNTech vaccination among elderly. News-Medical, viewed 25 April 2024, https://www.news-medical.net/news/20211123/Limited-immune-responses-three-months-after-Pfizer-BioNTech-vaccination-among-elderly.aspx.

Comments

  1. Kerry Walker Kerry Walker United States says:

    medRxiv publishes preliminary scientific reports that are not peer-reviewed and, therefore, should not be regarded as conclusive, guide clinical practice/health-related behavior, or treated as established information.

  2. Vita Quasus Vita Quasus Canada says:

    Quote
    Currently available COVID-19 vaccines are both safe and efficacious and aid in developing humoral immunity and cellular protection. However, data on elderly and geriatric populations is lacking. 
    End Quote

    The second sentence provides proof the first sentence is a lie.

The opinions expressed here are the views of the writer and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of News Medical.
Post a new comment
Post

While we only use edited and approved content for Azthena answers, it may on occasions provide incorrect responses. Please confirm any data provided with the related suppliers or authors. We do not provide medical advice, if you search for medical information you must always consult a medical professional before acting on any information provided.

Your questions, but not your email details will be shared with OpenAI and retained for 30 days in accordance with their privacy principles.

Please do not ask questions that use sensitive or confidential information.

Read the full Terms & Conditions.

You might also like...
Annual COVID-19 vaccine proves to be a wise investment for personal health and pocketbook